Why does the Vatican have a serpent building?

You were brainwashed as we all were when you were introduced to the spinning globe when you started school.

View attachment 6401
Ok but you haven’t answered my question TT, and if you are so knowledgeable about this subject, as you imply that you are, I would expect you to have the answer. If it is flat, what holds it in place. Is it balanced on something and if so what, and what stops it tilting or flipping over. I’d welcome your enlightened response
 
Its flat and stationary Greenghirl ,i should know i nearly fell off the edge 🤣
To understand Flat Earth you need to rid yourself of this ridiculous concept we are a floating spinning ball in the vast vacuum of space. The Big Bang is utter nonsense. Space is fake.

1578593167468.png
 
Ok but you haven’t answered my question TT, and if you are so knowledgeable about this subject, as you imply that you are, I would expect you to have the answer. If it is flat, what holds it in place. Is it balanced on something and if so what, and what stops it tilting or flipping over. I’d welcome your enlightened response
The Bible talks about the pillars of the earth. In Job 9:6 it says, "Who shakes the earth out of its place, and its pillars tremble." In Psalm 75:3 it says, "The earth and all its inhabitants are melting away; I set firm its pillars In I Samuel 2:8 it says, "For the pillars of the earth are the Lord’s and he had set the world upon them." The Hebrew word for pillar is yqxm. The root is qx meaning "to melt" (BDB 1980, 848). Therefore, yqxm means, "a molten like pillar." The only other place it occurs is in I Samuel 14:5 referring to a mountain. Probably the pillars of the earth are the same thing as the foundations of the earth which were mountains.

1578593478601.png
 
We live on a stationary plane. The sun and stars rotate above us. In order to create an accurate map, we need more investigation. NASA receives 50 million dollars a day, Flat Earthers have no budget.

View attachment 6394

View attachment 6395

View attachment 6396

View attachment 6397

View attachment 6398

View attachment 6399

View attachment 6400
All these flat maps seem to have huge distance between South America and Australia

With quickest route being over the North Pole.

Yet the airplanes seem to reach South America much faster than their max speed would expect and they never fly over North Pole ever on that route.

It would suggest the tropic of Capricorn is a circle much more than twice the circumference of the circle of tropic of cancer.

And the equator seems to be a circle smaller than Capricorn and bigger than tropic of cancer?

Does this fir reality?

Doesn't appear to be much land south of the tropic of Capricorn

And what is the centre of the earth on this map if east and west start at the south of the flat earth?

South on the traditional sense of a flat map

is north pole the centre of the earth?


If so which South is the dividing line between east and west?
 
The Bible talks about the pillars of the earth. In Job 9:6 it says, "Who shakes the earth out of its place, and its pillars tremble." In Psalm 75:3 it says, "The earth and all its inhabitants are melting away; I set firm its pillars In I Samuel 2:8 it says, "For the pillars of the earth are the Lord’s and he had set the world upon them." The Hebrew word for pillar is yqxm. The root is qx meaning "to melt" (BDB 1980, 848). Therefore, yqxm means, "a molten like pillar." The only other place it occurs is in I Samuel 14:5 referring to a mountain. Probably the pillars of the earth are the same thing as the foundations of the earth which were mountains.

View attachment 6403
No sorry TT I’m really not convinced. I’ll stick with the wee ball wizzing round in space version fir now.
Not that it makes a blind bit of difference to us wee humans living on it.
 
The Bible talks about the pillars of the earth. In Job 9:6 it says, "Who shakes the earth out of its place, and its pillars tremble." In Psalm 75:3 it says, "The earth and all its inhabitants are melting away; I set firm its pillars In I Samuel 2:8 it says, "For the pillars of the earth are the Lord’s and he had set the world upon them." The Hebrew word for pillar is yqxm. The root is qx meaning "to melt" (BDB 1980, 848). Therefore, yqxm means, "a molten like pillar." The only other place it occurs is in I Samuel 14:5 referring to a mountain. Probably the pillars of the earth are the same thing as the foundations of the earth which were mountains.

View attachment 6403
The New Testament reveals the church is the pillar and foundation of the truth.

So if the church (mystical body of christ) is the pillar and foundation then perhaps your interpretation is not stable.

Since the bible says you want to know the true interpretation take your query to the church.

 
All these flat maps seem to have huge distance between South America and Australia

With quickest route being over the North Pole.

Yet the airplanes seem to reach South America much faster than their max speed would expect and they never fly over North Pole ever on that route.

It would suggest the tropic of Capricorn is a circle much more than twice the circumference of the circle of tropic of cancer.

And the equator seems to be a circle smaller than Capricorn and bigger than tropic of cancer?

Does this fir reality?

Doesn't appear to be much land south of the tropic of Capricorn

And what is the centre of the earth on this map if east and west start at the south of the flat earth?

South on the traditional sense of a flat map

is north pole the centre of the earth?


If so which South is the dividing line between east and west?
And why is east and west bending on the flat map?

Why is it not straight east and west like on a normal flat map?
 
Winds

waves

tides

weather where do these all fit in in your flat earth theory
Why should wind and waves be any different on a flat earth than how you already perceive them to be created on a spinning ball. Actually we are told the earths atmosphere turns at the same speed as the earths rotation, so how could we have a wind moving in the opposite direction of the earths spin (if its a spinning ball). We are told the moon causes the sea tides, but if that was the case, why would the moon not affect lakes also. Also, how can the moons gravitational pull override the earths gravitational pull? Why does the earth not pull the moon towards it? The answer is gravity does not exist and how tides are caused is still open to debate.

“It is affirmed that the intensity of attraction increases with proximity, and vice versâ. How, then, when the waters are drawn up by the moon from their bed, and away from the earth's attraction,--which at that greater distance from the centre is considerably diminished, while that of the moon is proportionately increased--is it possible that all the waters acted on should be prevented leaving the earth and flying away to the moon? If the moon has power of attraction sufficient to lift the waters of the earth at all, even a single inch from their deepest receptacles, where the earth's attraction is much the greater, there is nothing in the theory of attraction of gravitation to prevent her taking to herself all the waters which come within her influence. Let the smaller body once overcome the power of the larger, and the power of the smaller becomes greater than when it first operated, because the matter acted on is nearer to it. Proximity is greater, and therefore power is greater … How then can the waters of the ocean immediately underneath the moon flow towards the shores, and so cause a flood tide? Water flows, it is said, through the law of gravity, or attraction of the earth's centre; is it possible then for the moon, having once overcome the power of the earth, to let go her hold upon the waters, through the influence of a power which she has conquered, and which therefore, is less than her own? … The above and other difficulties which exist in connection with the explanation of the tides afforded by the Newtonian system, have led many, including Sir Isaac Newton himself, to admit that such explanation is the least satisfactory portion of the ‘theory of gravitation.’ Thus we have been carried forward by the sheer force of evidence to the conclusion that the tides of the sea do not arise from the attraction of the moon, but simply from the rising and falling of the floating earth in the waters of the ‘great deep.’ That calmness which is found to exist at the bottom of the great seas could not be possible if the waters were alternately raised by the moon and pulled down by the earth.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (159-175)

 
Why should wind and waves be any different on a flat earth than how you already perceive them to be created on a spinning ball. Actually we are told the earths atmosphere turns at the same speed as the earths rotation, so how could we have a wind moving in the opposite direction of the earths spin (if its a spinning ball). We are told the moon causes the sea tides, but if that was the case, why would the moon not affect lakes also. Also, how can the moons gravitational pull override the earths gravitational pull? Why does the earth not pull the moon towards it? The answer is gravity does not exist and how tides are caused is still open to debate.

“It is affirmed that the intensity of attraction increases with proximity, and vice versâ. How, then, when the waters are drawn up by the moon from their bed, and away from the earth's attraction,--which at that greater distance from the centre is considerably diminished, while that of the moon is proportionately increased--is it possible that all the waters acted on should be prevented leaving the earth and flying away to the moon? If the moon has power of attraction sufficient to lift the waters of the earth at all, even a single inch from their deepest receptacles, where the earth's attraction is much the greater, there is nothing in the theory of attraction of gravitation to prevent her taking to herself all the waters which come within her influence. Let the smaller body once overcome the power of the larger, and the power of the smaller becomes greater than when it first operated, because the matter acted on is nearer to it. Proximity is greater, and therefore power is greater … How then can the waters of the ocean immediately underneath the moon flow towards the shores, and so cause a flood tide? Water flows, it is said, through the law of gravity, or attraction of the earth's centre; is it possible then for the moon, having once overcome the power of the earth, to let go her hold upon the waters, through the influence of a power which she has conquered, and which therefore, is less than her own? … The above and other difficulties which exist in connection with the explanation of the tides afforded by the Newtonian system, have led many, including Sir Isaac Newton himself, to admit that such explanation is the least satisfactory portion of the ‘theory of gravitation.’ Thus we have been carried forward by the sheer force of evidence to the conclusion that the tides of the sea do not arise from the attraction of the moon, but simply from the rising and falling of the floating earth in the waters of the ‘great deep.’ That calmness which is found to exist at the bottom of the great seas could not be possible if the waters were alternately raised by the moon and pulled down by the earth.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (159-175)

Thats a cartoon TT

I want proof
 
When the bible was written who the hell knew anything about anything?
Love the fact that the doobie Dubay uses 'science' that is hundreds of years old and quotes deid folk as if they were Astrophysicists and rocket scientists.

PROZAC, NURSE, WHERE'S THE TWAT'S PROZAC?
 
The New Testament reveals the church is the pillar and foundation of the truth.

So if the church (mystical body of christ) is the pillar and foundation then perhaps your interpretation is not stable.

Since the bible says you want to know the true interpretation take your query to the church.

Greenghirl asked me what holds our earth in place and what stops it tilting or flipping over. I answered her as best I could. No one mentioned "The Church", not Greenghirl, not I. Once again you make an unnecessary irrelevant statement, just to cause some unnecessary argument. If you insist on arguing, at least try harder.
 
To understand Flat Earth you need to rid yourself of this ridiculous concept we are a floating spinning ball in the vast vacuum of space. The Big Bang is utter nonsense. Space is fake.

View attachment 6402

To understand Flat Earth you need to rid yourself of this ridiculous concept we are a floating spinning ball in the vast vacuum of space. The Big Bang is utter nonsense. Space is fake.

View attachment 6402
I believe you TT🤓
 
Greenghirl asked me what holds our earth in place and what stops it tilting or flipping over. I answered her as best I could. No one mentioned "The Church", not Greenghirl, not I. Once again you make an unnecessary irrelevant statement, just to cause some unnecessary argument. If you insist on arguing, at least try harder.
You mentioned the bible

And the bible states quite clearly the church is the pillar and foundation of truth

So again its very relevant to your statement.

You chose bible as reference to nonsense I chose it to spell out what it actually teaches

Weird that eh?
 
You mentioned the bible

And the bible states quite clearly the church is the pillar and foundation of truth

So again its very relevant to your statement.

You chose bible as reference to nonsense I chose it to spell out what it actually teaches

Weird that eh?

1578595894727.png
 

Members online

No members online now.

Back
Top