Oh for fuck sake. I’ve never said it was their fault and I take issue with you assertion I did. The fault is not with any of the young men who are at our club, I have said repeatedly, check my posts, that’s it’s Rogers, and his dismal record in % terms.
The facts are the facts though, wether you want to accept them though, there are at least 12 players who do absolutely sweet fuck all for their wages, so save all the emotional, playing to the gallery Shite about them. I know it’s not their fault.
It’s the attitude of the of the club, bringing in young guys hoping they are good. Well , it hasn’t worked. There are wage thief’s at the club, but it’s not their fault and as working men good fucking luck to them.
I don’t blame one of them, what I do take exception to is how many there are. Too fucking many, so save the the emotional bollocks please. I know it’s not their fault. That doesn’t mean it’s not somebody’s fault, over £100k a week goes out the door for fuck all.
If you think that’s ok, then have a word with yourself and stop trying to paint yourself as a defender of a group im not attacking, do you think i came up with that term? It’s Rogers and the board for buying them. Dismal judgement. Costly dismal judgement by Rogers and the board. Not the young guys we bought. I think if you read my posts you will see I’m quite clear about the utter ballsup of Rogers signings. 20 and 6 get a game regularly, unintentional, bought through abysmal judgement, but not their fault. We cannot afford £100k a week for no return. That’s the deal, and it needs to change.
If you want to have a go at me l, as you monotonously do, pick better stuff. They are fucking wage thief’s but it’s not their fault. I never said it was. It’s Rogers fault, and I have said that more than once.
Have you? Or do you think everything’s fucking dandy having double figures of the pool doing Fuck all? And will continue to do Fuck all.
Save me the emotional defence ffs of something I wasn’t attacking. And while your at it take a day off from trying to have a go. Your as subtle as a rhino horn up the arse.
Theverdict1
I read the the thread you started and your original post with great interest yesterday.
I believe you presented your points very well and I would never detract from anyone expressing themselves and their opinions, regardless of whether they differ from mine or anyone else's.
I genuinely believe that you are a dedicated Celtic man and that you have experienced the full gamut of emotions that come with following our Club.
I admire your passion and your conviction, but I must confess to being rather confused at your earlier comment in this thread, as I too thought you were making a pointed accusation at the ethics of some of our fringe players. If I misconstrued that, then I sincerely apologise.
However - your latest post (as cited) tends to make more pointed accusations about the decisions of The Manager and I feel that is extremely unfair.
It may well be that you have a case regarding BR's transfer record, but considering that we are not entirely certain of what part he plays in identifying targets, negotiations and powers of veto, then it is a bit of a stretch to lay the blame entirely at his door.
Many of these players were also on the books prior to BR's tenure, so it is unreasonable to condemn him for working with players that may not share his vision.
The Manager has a record which will not likely be bettered in our lifetime. Sure, there are question marks over our European campaigns, but domestically - the man's record is unprecedented.
Is it not fair to suggest that BR's apparent disenchantment in the Summer was due to his lack of involvement in The Club's transfer dealings?
You may have internal sources that can establish BR's role in transfer negotiations, but until this becomes public record, I think it is fair to assume that Celtic's trading is done by committee.
In my opinion, Boab1916 made an extremely valid response to your earlier comment, as I mentioned earlier, I read it similarly and posted likewise to that effect.
I appreciate your sentiments about not giving a fuck what anyone else thinks, but your subsequent posts after your original post would tend to be contrary to that opinion. Your approach was more passive and less inclined to provoke discourse in the debate.
Opinions are like arse holes, everyone's got one and I don't think a site like this should be subjected to censorship unless the topic was particularly distasteful.
You have displayed a wit and intelligence which is better suited to constructive debate and it is a real shame that you seem to have reverted to a defensive posture.
There is no wrong that can be attached to disagreement, it's the manner in which we disagree that has to be considered.
I post this in good faith, HH