May election

Sorry bhoys and ghirls but while I fully accept people on here have their own personal political positions, opinions and views there's a few things being stated on here that are either just plain false or they're being misrepresented (possibly unintentionally)....

The UK is NOT a country, it's a political Union between 3 countries and a province (NI), therefore Scotland is NOT a 'region of the UK' it's a country that entered into a political treaty with 2 other countries to create the UK. While Wales was once considered a principality by some there was never any question that Scotland was and always has been a country in it's own right and that status is recognised in international law.

Greater London, the Midlands, Glasgow & Clyde, Dumfries & Galloway, North Wales, South Wales are 'regions' the countries they exist in are NOT. Scotland being labelled a 'region' is nothing more than deliberately loaded rhetoric intended by Unionists to portray Scotland as having no more right to self-determination than the likes of Greater London or the Midlands even though Scotland is recognised as a country in it's own right under international law while the other 2 are merely recognised as regions of England.

Also this whole 'once in a generation' argument that is thrown back at Scottish Independence supporters like it's some sort of political slam dunk for the Unionist argument is bunkum......for a start the whole foundation for that argument is based on a soundbite made by a politician (Alex Salmond) on the campaign trail, it was NEVER part of any official agreement.

Some people either don't seem to realise this or they wilfully ignore it because it doesn't suit their politics but neither Salmond nor any other politician had/have it within their power to bind the Scottish electorate to such an agreement as not only would it be fundamentally undemocratic but the 'once in a generation' argument has NO legal basis whatsoever and doesn't exist anywhere within the Edinburgh Agreement (voted for and passed by the Scottish parliament and signed by both the Scottish and UK governments) which DOES set out the parameters for any future Scottish independence referendum.

Also even if everybody did accept the premise of 'once in a generation' argument (which they don't) then a precedent has already been set by the UK government, the Good Friday Agreement, signed and agreed to by the UK State agrees and accepts that the definition of a 'political generation' in relation to referendums is 7 years. So even by the UK State's own definitions the threshold for another Scottish Independence referendum has already been met.

People can argue all day about whether democracy has been respected or if Brexit is just an excuse for another Independence referendum (aye I'm looking at you Hoopy 😜(y)) but democracy doesn't just end after the votes have been cast, people have the right to change their minds, that is why we have elections after all. As for Brexit, well when Unionist politicians used the 'only way to maintain continued EU membership' and the threat of 'being out of the EU if you vote for Independence' as one of their biggest arguments for remaining part of the UK and voting NO in 2014 then anybody now saying that the Brexit vote is immaterial or isn't a legitimate argument in the independence debate is kidding themselves, they just don't want it to be because the Brexit result now undermines their side's position.
 
I was born with this terrible affliction.....I refuse to be told what to think, not by politicians, not by newspapers, not by anybody; so I'm definitely not going to tell anyone else what to think. All I would do is respectfully suggest you too do your research, and if you arrive at a different conclusion from me well, that's absolutely fine. At least your opinion will be your own, and not somebody elses.

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 100% bang on Frank!
 
I would be happy to go along with that except for one very important factor. If someone makes me a promise, and on taking that promise as being true, I then make a decision in good conscience only to find out I was lied to; I absolutely reserve the right to reverse my decision. I've spoken to a fair number of no voters who feel they were lied to and are going to vote yes next time.
Politicians don't lie Frank. They "mislead" and that applies to all.
 
Sorry bhoys and ghirls but while I fully accept people on here have their own personal political positions, opinions and views there's a few things being stated on here that are either just plain false or they're being misrepresented (possibly unintentionally)....

The UK is NOT a country, it's a political Union between 3 countries and a province (NI), therefore Scotland is NOT a 'region of the UK' it's a country that entered into a political treaty with 2 other countries to create the UK. While Wales was once considered a principality by some there was never any question that Scotland was and always has been a country in it's own right and that status is recognised in international law.

Greater London, the Midlands, Glasgow & Clyde, Dumfries & Galloway, North Wales, South Wales are 'regions' the countries they exist in are NOT. Scotland being labelled a 'region' is nothing more than deliberately loaded rhetoric intended by Unionists to portray Scotland as having no more right to self-determination than the likes of Greater London or the Midlands even though Scotland is recognised as a country in it's own right under international law while the other 2 are merely recognised as regions of England.

Also this whole 'once in a generation' argument that is thrown back at Scottish Independence supporters like it's some sort of political slam dunk for the Unionist argument is bunkum......for a start the whole foundation for that argument is based on a soundbite made by a politician (Alex Salmond) on the campaign trail, it was NEVER part of any official agreement.

Some people either don't seem to realise this or they wilfully ignore it because it doesn't suit their politics but neither Salmond nor any other politician had/have it within their power to bind the Scottish electorate to such an agreement as not only would it be fundamentally undemocratic but the 'once in a generation' argument has NO legal basis whatsoever and doesn't exist anywhere within the Edinburgh Agreement (voted for and passed by the Scottish parliament and signed by both the Scottish and UK governments) which DOES set out the parameters for any future Scottish independence referendum.

Also even if everybody did accept the premise of 'once in a generation' argument (which they don't) then a precedent has already been set by the UK government, the Good Friday Agreement, signed and agreed to by the UK State agrees and accepts that the definition of a 'political generation' in relation to referendums is 7 years. So even by the UK State's own definitions the threshold for another Scottish Independence referendum has already been met.

People can argue all day about whether democracy has been respected or if Brexit is just an excuse for another Independence referendum (aye I'm looking at you Hoopy 😜(y)) but democracy doesn't just end after the votes have been cast, people have the right to change their minds, that is why we have elections after all. As for Brexit, well when Unionist politicians used the 'only way to maintain continued EU membership' and the threat of 'being out of the EU if you vote for Independence' as one of their biggest arguments for remaining part of the UK and voting NO in 2014 then anybody now saying that the Brexit vote is immaterial or isn't a legitimate argument in the independence debate is kidding themselves, they just don't want it to be because the Brexit result now undermines their side's position.
OK I asked this earlier and unsurprisingly got no answers, so I'll ask you directly since you mentioned me.
If the 2014 referendum had delivered a yes vote would nationalists after 6 years of independence support a vote to rejoin the UK or would they see the referendum result as final?
 
Sorry bhoys and ghirls but while I fully accept people on here have their own personal political positions, opinions and views there's a few things being stated on here that are either just plain false or they're being misrepresented (possibly unintentionally)....

The UK is NOT a country, it's a political Union between 3 countries and a province (NI), therefore Scotland is NOT a 'region of the UK' it's a country that entered into a political treaty with 2 other countries to create the UK. While Wales was once considered a principality by some there was never any question that Scotland was and always has been a country in it's own right and that status is recognised in international law.

Greater London, the Midlands, Glasgow & Clyde, Dumfries & Galloway, North Wales, South Wales are 'regions' the countries they exist in are NOT. Scotland being labelled a 'region' is nothing more than deliberately loaded rhetoric intended by Unionists to portray Scotland as having no more right to self-determination than the likes of Greater London or the Midlands even though Scotland is recognised as a country in it's own right under international law while the other 2 are merely recognised as regions of England.

Also this whole 'once in a generation' argument that is thrown back at Scottish Independence supporters like it's some sort of political slam dunk for the Unionist argument is bunkum......for a start the whole foundation for that argument is based on a soundbite made by a politician (Alex Salmond) on the campaign trail, it was NEVER part of any official agreement.

Some people either don't seem to realise this or they wilfully ignore it because it doesn't suit their politics but neither Salmond nor any other politician had/have it within their power to bind the Scottish electorate to such an agreement as not only would it be fundamentally undemocratic but the 'once in a generation' argument has NO legal basis whatsoever and doesn't exist anywhere within the Edinburgh Agreement (voted for and passed by the Scottish parliament and signed by both the Scottish and UK governments) which DOES set out the parameters for any future Scottish independence referendum.

Also even if everybody did accept the premise of 'once in a generation' argument (which they don't) then a precedent has already been set by the UK government, the Good Friday Agreement, signed and agreed to by the UK State agrees and accepts that the definition of a 'political generation' in relation to referendums is 7 years. So even by the UK State's own definitions the threshold for another Scottish Independence referendum has already been met.

People can argue all day about whether democracy has been respected or if Brexit is just an excuse for another Independence referendum (aye I'm looking at you Hoopy 😜(y)) but democracy doesn't just end after the votes have been cast, people have the right to change their minds, that is why we have elections after all. As for Brexit, well when Unionist politicians used the 'only way to maintain continued EU membership' and the threat of 'being out of the EU if you vote for Independence' as one of their biggest arguments for remaining part of the UK and voting NO in 2014 then anybody now saying that the Brexit vote is immaterial or isn't a legitimate argument in the independence debate is kidding themselves, they just don't want it to be because the Brexit result now undermines their side's position.
Have you studied how a country has to gain entry into the EU? The rules for acceptance are rigid and entry would take ALL existing members to accept which in itself is highly unlikely notwithstanding to prove a track record of financially being able to stand on it's own two feet.
 
OK I asked this earlier and unsurprisingly got no answers, so I'll ask you directly since you mentioned me.
If the 2014 referendum had delivered a yes vote would nationalists after 6 years of independence support a vote to rejoin the UK or would they see the referendum result as final?

I mentioned you tongue-in-cheek Hoopy hence the '😜(y)' emojis but I'll happily answer your question mate......if any party stood on that position in their manifesto and were voted into power on the back of it....yes I would support such a referendum as that's democracy.

I wouldn't support rejoining but I would accept it being put back to the people of Scotland to decide on it.
 
If the 2014 referendum had returned a yes vote, and independence turned into a shambles (no need to have a vivid imagination to picture that) how many nationalists here would support a second referendum to rejoin the UK?

Honest answers only please....
Yes I absolutely would support it. I see your asking if that result should be accepted as final? Well, I don't think any generation has the right to inflict their choices in perpetuity on future generations. So, that part, no .
 
Have you studied how a country has to gain entry into the EU? The rules for acceptance are rigid and entry would take ALL existing members to accept which in itself is highly unlikely notwithstanding to prove a track record of financially being able to stand on it's own two feet.

I'm aware of the arguments around the criteria for gaining entry into the EU Steviebhoy but given the leading members of EU itself along with many of the smaller countries have already stated they see no reason not to grant an Independent Scotland entry and have spoken openly about Scotland being fast tracked back in makes this less of an issue than some portray it to be.

Highly unlikely? Says who? Even Spain (who had reservations due to their own situation with Barcelona etc.) has changed it's position on an Independent Scotland rejoining.

As for the financials, we've had this debate before and we clearly don't agree on it, but even dyed in the wool Tories like David Cameron have already conceded an Independent Scotland is financially viable.
 
I mentioned you tongue-in-cheek Hoopy hence the '😜(y)' emojis but I'll happily answer your question mate......if any party stood on that position in their manifesto and were voted into power on the back of it....yes I would support such a referendum as that's democracy.

I wouldn't support rejoining but I would accept it being put back to the people of Scotland to decide on it.
So let's imagine an independent Scotland, no point voting for the SNP because their a one trick party and they've played their card so their share of the vote will surely plummet, leaving.....Tories and Labour to pick up the votes, both unionist parties, so referendum 3 is inevitable!

It'll be like the fucking hokey pokey, in out in out!

The country is very much split 50 50 on independence, so whatever happens a huge part of the population will be against it, if you had a referendum every year for a decade the outcome would likely change every year. Make it a requirement to gain 66% of the vote to make the change, that'll put an end to this nonsense once and for all! 😹
 
Back
Top