Another honest mistake

Yang saw straight red for standing still and raising boot to control ball. Hearts player comes flying in from side of Yangs and throws his head straight into Yangs boot. Red Card.

Barron runs at St Mirren player, sticks a straight leg, studs up at pace, full boot in the guys face. Not even booked.
Aitken, the guy who had the biggest smile on his face when he got to watch Gazza score for the legends, was on VAR.
 
Yang saw straight red for standing still and raising boot to control ball. Hearts player comes flying in from side of Yangs and throws his head straight into Yangs boot. Red Card.

Barron runs at St Mirren player, sticks a straight leg, studs up at pace, full boot in the guys face. Not even booked.
Aitken, the guy who had the biggest smile on his face when he got to watch Gazza score for the legends, was on VAR.

The duplicitous and cheating nature of refereeing we regularly witness is truly disgraceful. The evidence is clearly there that this is the case. One law for deidco and another for everyone else.

Where are you UEFA?…
 
The MiB cheating reached a pinnacle yesterday in both games. You know it must be bad when the pundits saw it as well, though they will just put it down to ineptitude.

They're overtly blatant and work hard to find a decision that they think will cover their actions but they don't care if we're aware of what they're up to because there is never any consequences.

Celtic might not call it out but we need to. The GB have a topic for their next tifo.
 
Some rocket on the BBC panel stated that, because it wasn't a full boot in the face and that the St Mirren player managed to avoid the full force of Barrons studs, that the decision was probably correct!!!
This would be the same BBC Sportscene, that when Porteous for hibs was sent off for making NO contact with the Sevco player, said the ref was 100% correct to show the red due to "intent".
It beggars fucking belief!!!
 
Some rocket on the BBC panel stated that, because it wasn't a full boot in the face and that the St Mirren player managed to avoid the full force of Barrons studs, that the decision was probably correct!!!
This would be the same BBC Sportscene, that when Porteous for hibs was sent off for making NO contact with the Sevco player, said the ref was 100% correct to show the red due to "intent".
It beggars fucking belief!!!

In essence, cheating is second nature to the Huns and their ilk. Their sense of entitlement and self interest is paramount. When these traits are at play, truth becomes a victim…
 
But there will only be answers if someone within Celtic asks them, as no-one in the media will do it, unlike if it had happened against a certain other club.

 
Yang saw straight red for standing still and raising boot to control ball. Hearts player comes flying in from side of Yangs and throws his head straight into Yangs boot. Red Card.

Barron runs at St Mirren player, sticks a straight leg, studs up at pace, full boot in the guys face. Not even booked.
Aitken, the guy who had the biggest smile on his face when he got to watch Gazza score for the legends, was on VAR.
Shortly after Yang was sent off for high boot against Hearts, Soapy Souttar "somehow" escaped punishment against Hearts for this incident.

Screenshot_20240803_150401_X.jpg

These sort of challenges when you charge in and fling your boot up at head level knowing the opponent is there are much more reckless and dangerous than when Yang accidently came within a few inches of a player's head with little force.

Connor Barron high boot.jpg
 
Last edited:
Penalty...to sevco
Gollum's new KMI Panel outcomes have released their latest decisions from last weekend's top flight fixtures and after a 'lengthy' discussion over the incident involving Daizen Maeda and Stephen O'Donnell, they have came to the majority decision that a spot-kick should have been awarded to Celtic as there was indeed a penalty incident before the handball.

"The panel deemed this to be a correct intervention for a handball which led directly to a goal. The panel agreed this is a difficult incident for the Referee to identify, however also agreed that the Assistant Referee should have identified this offense on-field. After a lengthy discussion on the incident, the majority (4:1) of the panel deemed this should have firstly been identified as a foul by the on-field Referee and an on-field review should have been recommended by the VAR when the penalty was not awarded. As the goal was correctly ruled out for handball, the majority of the panel (4:1) felt the penalty-kick should have been awarded as this offence occurred before the handball. One panel member felt the decision not to award the penalty-kick was correct and that no intervention was required.”

So one "expert" actually thought that this was NOT a penalty! And yet again, it comes far too late to do us any good.

Hunbelievably, they also said that the ref was correct not to send off Connor Barron for kicking an opponent in the face in an incident much worse than Yang "correctly" saw red for! They did say that he could have been booked for it though. I never saw any mention of the penalty St Mirren were not awarded at Ibrokes, but I think we all know how they would have voted for this incident too.
 
Gollum's new KMI Panel outcomes have released their latest decisions from last weekend's top flight fixtures and after a 'lengthy' discussion over the incident involving Daizen Maeda and Stephen O'Donnell, they have came to the majority decision that a spot-kick should have been awarded to Celtic as there was indeed a penalty incident before the handball.

"The panel deemed this to be a correct intervention for a handball which led directly to a goal. The panel agreed this is a difficult incident for the Referee to identify, however also agreed that the Assistant Referee should have identified this offense on-field. After a lengthy discussion on the incident, the majority (4:1) of the panel deemed this should have firstly been identified as a foul by the on-field Referee and an on-field review should have been recommended by the VAR when the penalty was not awarded. As the goal was correctly ruled out for handball, the majority of the panel (4:1) felt the penalty-kick should have been awarded as this offence occurred before the handball. One panel member felt the decision not to award the penalty-kick was correct and that no intervention was required.”

So one "expert" actually thought that this was NOT a penalty! And yet again, it comes far too late to do us any good.

Hunbelievably, they also said that the ref was correct not to send off Connor Barron for kicking an opponent in the face in an incident much worse than Yang "correctly" saw red for! They did say that he could have been booked for it though. I never saw any mention of the penalty St Mirren were not awarded at Ibrokes, but I think we all know how they would have voted for this incident too.
Do you think the one that said it wasn’t a penalty is the infamous human beatbox bugler 👀
 
Back
Top