Celtic Pets

Huns still going on about the vote. Why did the SPFL teams all vote if they did not think they had enough time or were been bullied. Sevco voted I am sure they would never have voted if they felt bullied and I am sure they would not have voted ad waited 28 days, the huns were in with the Partick ICT and Dundee whatsapp group and voted confedentally thinking due to what they knew it was going to fail, Dundee pulled the rug when they told the SPFL discard our vote, it meant that the vote was still on tender hooks depending on Dundee, however, whilst everyone is claiming that would have been it over had the three amigos votes been cast, it would not have been until the 28 day period had expired thats what the no to a yes clause is for, its a legal clause, resoloutions become set in stone when there is a an agreed majority, however if the agreed majority is not met the 28 day kicks in in case a vote has been cast in anger and later when the cooling off period is force they may cool down and change no to a yes.

Commercial agreements and proposals and as with consumer law have to allow a 28 day cooling off period, the huns know this and thats why they are dragging their heels, Dundee changed their mind as could Partick and ICT had they wanted the resoloution did not die and would not die until 28 days passed.
As a tim we call this one the passover. The huns are now looking for an arguement to appease the hordes and hoping to galvanise enough anger to entice season tickets.

The huns empty threats lie below with no substance, no court if possible would touch a case based on allegations without substance. And for the lurkers Celtic hate the SPFL and SFA more than yous do, think 2012 and EBT and LNS. Celtic would have took the title easily and Celtic are looking at the threat of giving away a quadruple.

complaint-box-complaints-consumer.jpg
 
Quarantine week 4, still no haircut
Giving you a run for your money Michael
HH
YNWA


Week 4, still no haircut .jpg

kDHBjN8.jpg
 
Huns still going on about the vote. Why did the SPFL teams all vote if they did not think they had enough time or were been bullied. Sevco voted I am sure they would never have voted if they felt bullied and I am sure they would not have voted ad waited 28 days, the huns were in with the Partick ICT and Dundee whatsapp group and voted confedentally thinking due to what they knew it was going to fail, Dundee pulled the rug when they told the SPFL discard our vote, it meant that the vote was still on tender hooks depending on Dundee, however, whilst everyone is claiming that would have been it over had the three amigos votes been cast, it would not have been until the 28 day period had expired thats what the no to a yes clause is for, its a legal clause, resoloutions become set in stone when there is a an agreed majority, however if the agreed majority is not met the 28 day kicks in in case a vote has been cast in anger and later when the cooling off period is force they may cool down and change no to a yes.

Commercial agreements and proposals and as with consumer law have to allow a 28 day cooling off period, the huns know this and thats why they are dragging their heels, Dundee changed their mind as could Partick and ICT had they wanted the resoloution did not die and would not die until 28 days passed.
As a tim we call this one the passover. The huns are now looking for an arguement to appease the hordes and hoping to galvanise enough anger to entice season tickets.

The huns empty threats lie below with no substance, no court if possible would touch a case based on allegations without substance. And for the lurkers Celtic hate the SPFL and SFA more than yous do, think 2012 and EBT and LNS. Celtic would have took the title easily and Celtic are looking at the threat of giving away a quadruple.

View attachment 8697
Try explainin that tae a hun Boab,they're phuqed when ye get tae company law!
 
Hugh Keevins asking on Clyde should Rod McKenzie SPFL lawyer come and tell everyone that company law allows for a no to a yes. Why should he the Law is written in statue books the journalist should do his homework and the huns have a lawyer on their board, so why are the Huns not coming out and stating if they think it is wrong, because they know it is right, they have in the past and future sat on many committees to know that resoloutions pass on majorities and if there is a stalemate the cooling off period kicks in.
Bad blood occurs when resoloutions are made but sometimes during the cooling off there is a change of mood when things become clearer and sometimes people just change their mind after deliberation, the huns are skint.
 
Hugh Keevins asking on Clyde should Rod McKenzie SPFL lawyer come and tell everyone that company law allows for a no to a yes. Why should he the Law is written in statue books the journalist should do his homework and the huns have a lawyer on their board, so why are the Huns not coming out and stating if they think it is wrong, because they know it is right, they have in the past and future sat on many committees to know that resoloutions pass on majorities and if there is a stalemate the cooling off period kicks in.
Bad blood occurs when resoloutions are made but sometimes during the cooling off there is a change of mood when things become clearer and sometimes people just change their mind after deliberation, the huns are skint.
Thing is Boab the brain dead phux that support them don't want tae know that, and their corrupt board know this, those evil bastaarts are whipping the orcs into their favourite pastime,bile and hatred, they've been asked to present their 'evidence', if they can't do it, they should be hit with a disrepute charge!
 
Thing is Boab the brain dead phux that support them don't want tae know that, and their corrupt board know this, those evil bastaarts are whipping the orcs into their favourite pastime,bile and hatred, they've been asked to present their 'evidence', if they can't do it, they should be hit with a disrepute charge!
Onus is on them MD, you cannot make a charge against someone and not tell them the charge and show evidence so they can dispute your charge, so you walk into an inquiry with no rap sheet and the examination begins before you find out what the fuck they are on about and why you are there. And you have to defend this.
 
Onus is on them MD, you cannot make a charge against someone and not tell them the charge and show evidence so they can dispute your charge, so you walk into an inquiry with no rap sheet and the examination begins before you find out what the fuck they are on about and why you are there. And you have to defend this.
We know whit they're like Boab,their sense of entitlement,ridin roughshod, statement o'clock all to appease their phuqwit supporters,hopefully, they've taken a step too far,with their phuqin allegations and the SPFL,knowin' the shit state that club is in,call the phuqers out, everybody knows their out of order, even their sane(ish) fans are telling them to shut the phuq up! 🍺 🥳
 

Members online

Latest posts

Back
Top