We're talking about a few daft laddies setting off flares and you start comparing it to the French, Russian, Cuban, Korean, Vietnamese revolutions? FFS if thats not hysterical I don't know what is.
Oh, just for clarity for you and all the other agenda merchants, none of us are saying they should be allowed to continue setting off flares. Have you got that? Capice? Comprende? Good.
No its not daft wee laddies im talking about.
If its organised and safe then its coordinated
If its organised and illegal its criminal
If you dont like the laws you need to give better defense than myopic instinct
You really arent aware of morality
So you judgement is poor
And it reeks of totalitarian disharmony
I love the good stuff GB organise like opening eyes to injustice
But all the good work of exposing totalitarianism is diminished when they opt for the radical flaunting of the law and the good reputation they can inspire.
Daft wee laddies need moral guidance, of which you have on many occasions displayed you are devoid.
If it doesn't bother you it shouldn't bother anyone
if it bothers you it should bother everyone
Your view is king
And you think just like him but in a unique paradigm that conflict with some of his version of totalitarianism
Im hysterical because its dangerous
Your hysterical because your morality doesn't exist unless it directly affects your paradigm which if you arent aware is not balanced with empathy or sympathy with people who are personally aware or even socially aware.
If it doesn't fit with your totalitarian anarchy then its neurosis or psychotic
However im inclined to think your broad laissez faire attitude to criminal behaviour exposes that its really you who are hysterical in both uses of the word.
