Not necessarily. Bain is an adequate #1 and we should be looking for an adequate backup.We will sign another keeper who will have to be better than Scott Bain if he wants to wear the jersey. Most games our keeper will have to make less saves to make than the fingers on his gloves.
We should always be gaining a better player if possible. Read my post again carefully.Not necessarily. Bain is an adequate #1 and we should be looking for an adequate backup.
And I answered, not necessarily.We will sign another keeper who will have to be better than Scott Bain
Telt !goalkeeping 101,maybe even an 'ordinary' keeper but transformed through wearing a garishly patterned top!I read your post, Doc. Maybe you should learn to read. You said:
And I answered, not necessarily.
We don't really need to sign a keeper better than Scott Bain. Don't know what's so hard to understand about that statement.
"We will sign another keeper who will have to be better than Scott Bain if he wants to wear the jersey."I read your post, Doc. Maybe you should learn to read. You said:
And I answered, not necessarily.
We don't really need to sign a keeper better than Scott Bain. Don't know what's so hard to understand about that statement.
Sit down LarryFraser Forster is the best goalkeeper Celtic have ever had, but some way in my opinion.
Scott Bain is decent and dependable, nestled just behind Javier Sanchez Broto in the list of recent 'keepers.
If I hadn't seen such riches I could live with being poor.
Oh Sit down next to meIf I hadn't seen such riches I could live with being poor.