Morelos

We keep hearing from Slippy G and his friends in what is laughing called the media that Stevie is working hard with More-or-less to curb his tantrums .
I don't really remember him being so aggressive last season or being booked/sent off quite so much .
So my suspicion is that this is all down to Slippy G and his team winding up the Columbian crotch-snapper before games and TELLING him to put himself about .
This has happened since the very first game ( V Aberdeen ) and has got worse - despite the 'warnings' about behaviour from the Liverpool under 18's coach .
So , ignore what Slippy G says he is telling More-or-less - judge him by the number of yellow/reds between now and the season's end .
 
Very petulant and has absolutely no self control. Slippy will be Raging make no mistake, must have hurt the panel to dish that one out but what other options did they have. If that was one of our main players doin that l for one would be calling him for everything. But the mockits think he's the victim. Mind you they think there goin for 55! Fuckin moonfruits.
 
The Galway shawl said:
Very petulant and has absolutely no self control. Slippy will be Raging make no mistake, must have hurt the panel to dish that one out but what other options did they have. If that was one of our main players doin that l for one would be calling him for everything. But the mockits think he's the victim. Mind you they think there goin for 55! Fuckin moonfruits.
Click to expand...

And yet the huns are complaining about the fact that there's no level playing field and that their players aren't treated fairly. It's taking deluded to another dimension.
 
The Shamrock said:
Anyone for a Ponzi?
Click to expand...
Over on another site som good points made
"
nawlite 8th February 2019 at 19:43

While awaiting the Morelos decision, what about the ref and the Compliance protocol in this McGregor one then? Will madden be disciplined/demoted for failing to spot the violent conduct? Leaving aside the already-raised point about the in-game impact i.e. a penalty and a sending off denied to Aberdeen, how does the SFA explain how the panel can intervene here when the referee clearly saw the incident, but decided not to act. In the new year derby, the fact that Beaton saw the incidents was put forward as the reason why there could be no review. With Madden's positioning here, he can only have said the same as Beaton allegedly said i.e. I saw it and decided not to act. Images show that he cannot claim not to have seen it, which is the usual justification for the involvement of the panel. Will the SFA explain? Will any of the SMSM ask for clarification? Will Celtic ask for clarification? The panel's involvement in the McGregor case clearly demonstrates that there is a difference between the 2 incidents/statements – what can that be? 1. McGregor's and Morelos' transgressions were obvious red card offences (Morelos perhaps due to cumulative effect) = same 2. Each instance(s) was seen by the referee = same 3. Beaton was asked if he saw the incidents – if he said he hadn't the panel would become involved. According to our understanding of the process, Madden would have been asked if he saw the incident – if he said he hadn't the panel would become involved. This could provide a difference, but from the images there is no way on earth Madden could claim not to have seen the incident,, so this cannot be the difference that allowed the panel to become involved on this occasion. If both referees claimed that they saw the incident then that would lead to 4. Beaton saw the incidents and decided no action was necessary. As a result it was claimed that the panel could not become involved. Madden saw the incident and decided no action was necessary. As a result it would have been claimed that the panel would not become involved unless Madden admitted that he made a mistake . If that is the case, can we expect Madden to be disciplined? Will that be transparently reported? Don't hold your breath."
 
mind cheillini had him in his back bin and he chewed his shoulder ?think hes calmed down a lot now
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 300 (members: 3, guests: 297)

Latest posts

Share this page

Back
Top