I assume the SFA/SPFL will be banning Kris Boyd from the stadium and carpark after yet another incendiary incitement of his like-minded peepul? Week in, week out he launches into these unsubstantiated rants based on his own innate biasedness rather than actual facts.SFA STATEMENT: They're 100% correct but should be looking also at their own failings in administration of the game that have permitted such situations to arise.
Friday 15 May 2026
John Beaton and his family spent last night at home under police surveillance following a leak of personal details online.
The Scottish FA condemns in the strongest possible terms attempts to compromise the safety of match officials. Such vigilantism, motivated by decisions perceived to be right or wrong on a field of play, is a scourge on our national game and we are grateful to Police Scotland for their swift intervention.
We are also clear, sadly, that this is the inevitable consequence of the heightening criticism, intolerance and scapegoating demonstrated this season by media pundits, supporters, official supporters' groups, clubs, players, managers and former match officials.
We do not make that point lightly as the national association. Yet it is an inconvenient truth. Those who have sought to apportion blame and conspiracy towards match officials to deflect from defeats or perceived injustices throughout the season have contributed to an environment that puts the safety of our staff and match officials in jeopardy.
This is the consequence of a hysterical media narrative, fuelled by irresponsible knee-jerk post-match media interviews, commentary and official social media posts. The cumulative effect impacts on our ability to provide enough referees to service our game at all levels. When it compromises the safety and wellbeing of our most senior match officials, enough is enough.
Referees are not infallible. Mistakes will be made on the field, and subjective calls made in front of the VAR monitor, just as managers will pick the wrong team, goalkeepers concede soft goals and strikers miss from five yards out. Yet the reaction to these inevitabilities could not be more contrasting.
What happened yesterday is not an isolated incident. There are many examples of match officials being placed in harmful situations but with individuals fearful of speaking out lest it exacerbates the situation or causes further alarm to friends, family and colleagues.
We will not allow this to become the norm. We will not allow a situation where match officials require special provision to protect their children at school to be considered an occupational hazard. We will not allow a situation where staying at home with the front door locked and avoiding the hazards of public interaction becomes a coping strategy.
The Scottish FA will be seeking to strengthen its rules to better protect those integral to the game and urge those who will doubtless join us in condemning incidents like this to support those proposals, not contribute to their watering-down on the basis of self-preservation.
As we approach what should be an exciting finale to the season, we ask those who have personalised and hyperbolised their opinions, those who have sought the easy way out by attributing defeats to perceived refereeing errors, and those who have approved incendiary statements and posts to reflect on their contribution to creating an environment of intimidation, fear and alarm.
We urge tolerance and perspective to prevent any further, unthinkable escalation.
100% Mag7. Those you mentioned have always been staunch AF ,and will always be bitter against anyone, or anything to do with our club. Barry Ferguson, Ian Durrant, and McCoist permeate the 1690 song book, their hatred comes to the fore, let no one be fooled by McCoist's 'cheeky chappy' persona, he's a Hun to the core (I know people who know him, and Durrant is another bitter wee prick, again this from friends who have been in his company and were embarrassed by his antics) I give them absolutely no credit whatsoever as pundits. Let them shout all they want, the game is over and the result is in the history books. The 'we are just as bad' argument does not hold water, their support are reviled the world over, ask Manchester, or Spain, or Portugal, or anywhere their mutant faction travels. All clubs have some sort of idiots in their ranks, but they take the absolute piss when it comes to starting trouble. Witness their banning our supporters and attacking our players, fans, staff etc. Joe Hart and others, having to clear glass, bottles, debris etc from his area. It's a joke, the west of Scotland is rife with sectarianism, we have had to live with their vile marches every July down the coast, and the fact they are still allowed shows that nothing has changed for the better in towns, and cities, throughout Scotland. Oh and before I forget, it wiz a stonewall penalty, just ask Andrew Dallas on VAR. HHWHEN CELTIC WIN, THE MASKS SLIP
There was something revealing about the reaction to Celtic’s last-minute penalty on Wed night. Not just from rival supporters — that’s expected in football — but from sections of the Scottish media and pundit class who once again exposed the deep-rooted bitterness they carry whenever Celtic come out on top.
Let’s start with the facts: it was a penalty. Clear contact, clear foul, clear decision. The officials got it right. Yet you’d never know that listening to the outrage pouring from the Sky Sports panel afterwards. The hysteria was embarrassing.
Kris Boyd in particular looked absolutely raging. Not disappointed. Not debating. Furious. The kind of fury that only appears when Celtic benefit from a decision. And that’s the point. When Celtic were on the receiving end of shocking calls against Hibs earlier this season — four major decisions going against us — Boyd was front and centre telling everyone we “have to trust the officials.” Suddenly that principle disappears the moment Celtic get a decision in their favour? The hypocrisy is staggering.
Then came John Robertson and Paul Hartley piling on with the same theatrical outrage. No balance. No perspective. No acknowledgement that the referee applied the laws of the game correctly. Just another media pile-on because Celtic won.
And perhaps the biggest question of all: where was the credit for Celtic?
Once again, the champions-elect produce under pressure, fight until the final seconds, and show the mentality that has delivered sustained dominance for over a decade — yet the coverage became entirely about conspiracy, outrage and grievance. Why? Because too many in the Scottish football media simply cannot handle Celtic’s success.
That resentment has become impossible to hide.
Which brings us to Derek McInnes and his “disgusting” remarks. Why exactly is McInnes even acting as some moral authority on a Celtic match? The irony is breathtaking. This is a man who has previously been filmed singing “The Billy Boys” — a sectarian anthem that has shamed Scottish football for years — yet somehow he feels entitled to lecture others about what is or isn’t disgraceful.
The governing body also now faces an obvious question: if Brendan Rodgers could receive a ban this season for comments about officials, will McInnes face the same scrutiny? Or do the rules only apply selectively? Scottish football cannot claim consistency if one manager is punished while another is allowed to throw incendiary accusations around publicly without consequence.
The reality is that Celtic’s success has broken people. It has consumed pundits, columnists and former players who cannot stomach watching this club continue to dominate Scottish football. Every title hurts them more because it destroys the narrative they desperately try to push.
And that’s exactly why this championship would feel so sweet.
To win the league again while the likes of Boyd, McInnes, Alex Rae, Keith Jackson and Hugh Keevins rage themselves into knots would make it one of the most satisfying titles Celtic have ever won. Not because of rivalry — rivalry is healthy — but because of the sheer level of bitterness directed toward the club at every turn.
Sky Sports also need to take a serious look at the standard of analysis being broadcast. Punditry is supposed to offer insight, not emotional meltdowns driven by personal bias. Boyd’s constant anti-Celtic rhetoric has crossed the line from analysis into obsession. Supporters can disagree on decisions all day long — that’s football — but the inability of certain pundits to show even the slightest objectivity whenever Celtic are involved is becoming impossible to ignore.
Wed night wasn’t just about a penalty. It was about exposure. The masks slipped yet again. And the more Celtic keep winning, the more unhinged the reaction becomes.
Beaton denied us a stonewall penalty in the first half,,also denied us a stonewall penalty in the 94 th minute……the var team we are saying Dallas but there’s more than one official in there…called him to the monitor ….i have no doubts it broke his heart having to give that penalty but also took some bollocks….but he’s still and will always be a hun cunt…along with many others….100% Mag7. Those you mentioned have always been staunch AF ,and will always be bitter against anyone, or anything to do with our club. Barry Ferguson, Ian Durrant, and McCoist permeate the 1690 song book, their hatred comes to the fore, let no one be fooled by McCoist's 'cheeky chappy' persona, he's a Hun to the core (I know people who know him, and Durrant is another bitter wee prick, again this from friends who have been in his company and were embarrassed by his antics) I give them absolutely no credit whatsoever as pundits. Let them shout all they want, the game is over and the result is in the history books. The 'we are just as bad' argument does not hold water, their support are reviled the world over, ask Manchester, or Spain, or Portugal, or anywhere their mutant faction travels. All clubs have some sort of idiots in their ranks, but they take the absolute piss when it comes to starting trouble. Witness their banning our supporters and attacking our players, fans, staff etc. Joe Hart and other having to clear glass, bottles, debris etc from his area. It's a joke, the west of Scotland is rife with sectarianism, we have had to live with their vile marches every July down the coast, and the fact they are still allowed shows that nothing has changed for the better in towns and cities throughout Scotland. Oh and before I forget, I wiz a stonewall penalty, just ask Andrew Dallas on VAR. HH
I would have needed 3 bottles of JD to come up with that, thank fuck I've only got 2.WHEN CELTIC WIN, THE MASKS SLIP
There was something revealing about the reaction to Celtic’s last-minute penalty on Wed night. Not just from rival supporters — that’s expected in football — but from sections of the Scottish media and pundit class who once again exposed the deep-rooted bitterness they carry whenever Celtic come out on top.
Let’s start with the facts: it was a penalty. Clear contact, clear foul, clear decision. The officials got it right. Yet you’d never know that listening to the outrage pouring from the Sky Sports panel afterwards. The hysteria was embarrassing.
Kris Boyd in particular looked absolutely raging. Not disappointed. Not debating. Furious. The kind of fury that only appears when Celtic benefit from a decision. And that’s the point. When Celtic were on the receiving end of shocking calls against Hibs earlier this season — four major decisions going against us — Boyd was front and centre telling everyone we “have to trust the officials.” Suddenly that principle disappears the moment Celtic get a decision in their favour? The hypocrisy is staggering.
Then came John Robertson and Paul Hartley piling on with the same theatrical outrage. No balance. No perspective. No acknowledgement that the referee applied the laws of the game correctly. Just another media pile-on because Celtic won.
And perhaps the biggest question of all: where was the credit for Celtic?
Once again, the champions-elect produce under pressure, fight until the final seconds, and show the mentality that has delivered sustained dominance for over a decade — yet the coverage became entirely about conspiracy, outrage and grievance. Why? Because too many in the Scottish football media simply cannot handle Celtic’s success.
That resentment has become impossible to hide.
Which brings us to Derek McInnes and his “disgusting” remarks. Why exactly is McInnes even acting as some moral authority on a Celtic match? The irony is breathtaking. This is a man who has previously been filmed singing “The Billy Boys” — a sectarian anthem that has shamed Scottish football for years — yet somehow he feels entitled to lecture others about what is or isn’t disgraceful.
The governing body also now faces an obvious question: if Brendan Rodgers could receive a ban this season for comments about officials, will McInnes face the same scrutiny? Or do the rules only apply selectively? Scottish football cannot claim consistency if one manager is punished while another is allowed to throw incendiary accusations around publicly without consequence.
The reality is that Celtic’s success has broken people. It has consumed pundits, columnists and former players who cannot stomach watching this club continue to dominate Scottish football. Every title hurts them more because it destroys the narrative they desperately try to push.
And that’s exactly why this championship would feel so sweet.
To win the league again while the likes of Boyd, McInnes, Alex Rae, Keith Jackson and Hugh Keevins rage themselves into knots would make it one of the most satisfying titles Celtic have ever won. Not because of rivalry — rivalry is healthy — but because of the sheer level of bitterness directed toward the club at every turn.
Sky Sports also need to take a serious look at the standard of analysis being broadcast. Punditry is supposed to offer insight, not emotional meltdowns driven by personal bias. Boyd’s constant anti-Celtic rhetoric has crossed the line from analysis into obsession. Supporters can disagree on decisions all day long — that’s football — but the inability of certain pundits to show even the slightest objectivity whenever Celtic are involved is becoming impossible to ignore.
Wed night wasn’t just about a penalty. It was about exposure. The masks slipped yet again. And the more Celtic keep winning, the more unhinged the reaction becomes.
Youre of course bang on mt but i just also think Beaton has brought some of this on himself by his actions and antics in the past those antics in the rengers pub, the publicity that generated etc have propelled him in a way , inadvertently or not to this point and this situation.John Beaton gets abused from Celtic and rangers fans and other teams too but when it gets to the point your personal information is going online and you need police protection like he just had too (Sfa just brought out a statement) then that’s just wrong and the folk that do it are idiots
He does gets abused on personal level by a lot of people and none of us actually know him
Fuck been a ref this day and age fuck that
Wow cant sleep the anticipation for this game is intense come on the hoops lets win this game retain our title beat this best heart's side in a generation and show the world this is Celtics domain we are champions come on bhoys 3-1 Celtic HH
It's as if there's another competition going on in the background - the Who Can Be the Most Offended Cup.
How often are we told these decisions even themselves out?
Sour grapes![]()
Would I do that 50? Only if taxiFfs Ally thought you were calling for me to get barred there![]()
Cheers mt good idea. HahaYou lot need to be putting these comments on the match thread!![]()