CelticByNumbers has done an interesting analysis of the claim by Sevco that their players are being singled out retrospectively by the SFA for for disciplinary action after games .
This analysis shows exactly the OPPOSITE , while Celtic are the club which has ( potentially ) suffered most by the 'missing' of red card incidents .
The Rangers' statement that they are ''being held to a different code of conduct '' is quite true - they are being far more LENIENTLY refereed than all the other teams in the league .
It is Celtic who should be complaining about the numerous occasions this season that their opposition have been allowed to get away with a red card offence - only for it to be retrospectively given by the Compliance officer - when it is too late to affect the outcome of the game .
Great article - worth a read
Yes it is true.
But like all GASLies
They state the truth but offer false evidence to support the claim.
All psychopaths do it. They Blame the victims with subjective evidence that is paraded by their media streams with no real self analysis.
They have always been held to a diiferent code of conduct. Thats why the cry WATP
They think 100 percent biased for them is fair.
They think 50/50 equality is extreme bias against them.
Anything less than 100 percent rigged in favour of their grandiose self entitlement is unfair, and they will highlight the small percent of things against them as eveidnse that they are being treated unfairly.
They will never point out anything extreme biased in their favour like Lanarkshire referees social hierarchy
But they will point out any innocuous comment by anyone in power that is not 100 percent in their favour.
He once made a slapstick comment about the bears therefore is unfit for purpose but having 100 masonic secret agenda men is not an issue.
They will claim that stamping by their players is fair
They will claim accidental bumping as equal to deliberate foul play by them. even if its 9 stamps and one guy tripping them up, it will be but Whatabout that dude who tripped him up.
No reference to the 9 stamps or the heinous nature of the mindset.
If heaven forbid you try to stamp in retaliation you will get MSM hounding you as a vicious animal.
But will defend all 9 unprovoked stamps as accidental and not worth looking at since the Lanarkshire ref who didn't send him off, made a just call in spur of the moment, and well did I mention the accidental collision where he didn't send off the dude for opposition.
If he didn't send off the accident that wasn't a red, then why would he be questioned for fairly not sending off a bloke who accidentally elbowed a MSM target for abuse.
The Huns have had an extreme bias since the days of Primrose and Struth. Its a state backed bias. Its always been there and therefore yes,
Rangers and now Sevco are refereed to a different standard from all other teams.
FFS Scottish football would die if they were not allowed to cheat via refs, cheat via financial skullduggery, cheat through every and any means to allow Anybody but Celtic to win.
The ABC of refereeing means Rangers are held to a different standard as all other teams, since only state sponsored Sevco, with their tainted titles have secret agreements pretending they did not die.
Case closed.
Huns went burst and died.
Long live the huns.
HAIL HAIL
