Striker rejects sevco.

[Weedocbhoy60]

Kamberi rejects sevco to sign for continental giants St Gallen. Now even duff strikers don't want to go to deid co. Who's next on their list ?????
assuming they get money fur the Buffaloon of course.

 

[kelly]

Roofe is signing for them 4m ,anderlect bought him for 7m but are in freefall

 

[Bellshill bhoy]

Aye only if they can pay it up over 4 years, do they take provident checks in Belgium?

 

[Weedocbhoy60]

Roofe is signing for them 4m ,anderlect bought him for 7m but are in freefall

Does that mean that the Roofs fell in ??

 

[BhoyLennon]

Can we just stump up the money for Toney and stop dicking around. They haven’t a pot to piss in and have already spent 7m on kunt, 4mill on Roofe.

 

[dungloe67]

Roofe. The Huns haven’t paid anything yet. They’ve ask Anderlecht to put it on their slate.

 

[Hootie]

4m over 40 years for them racist cheating scum

 

[BhoyLennon]

Roofe. The Huns haven’t paid anything yet. They’ve ask Anderlecht to put it on their slate.

Aye they have, you think anderlecht are giving him for free??
Can wait to here how them mongos are paying for all this, going bang again

 

[_Neil_]

Roofe is signing for them 4m ,anderlect bought him for 7m but are in freefall

Anderlecht skint and sevco skint... who'll blink first?

 

[TET]

Aye they have, you think anderlecht are giving him for free??
Can wait to here how them mongos are paying for all this, going bang again

im sure they will be allowed to imperfectly register him and pay him off the books, that way they can shaft the taxman and offer him to everyone and anyone for 50million+

No need to run a club as a business since clubs are separate from their legal owners and cannot die.

 

[lennono]

Kent £7 million, Hagi £4 million, Roofe £5 million and Itten £4 million, if reports are true.

For that money I genuinely expect to win the league.

 

[TET]

Kent £7 million, Hagi £4 million, Roofe £5 million and Itten £4 million, if reports are true.

For that money I genuinely expect to win the league.

on top of a 10 million deficit in accounts that has yet to be explained and a wage bill that creates a 10 million deficit even with euro qualification and thats before you bring in 20+ million worth of better players with the expected increase in wages.

They have an underwriter

But perhaps for tax purposes he wants to be in the shadows?

 

[Shadow2]

Roofe is signing for them 4m ,anderlect bought him for 7m but are in freefall

Actually looks like a decent player tbh.

 

[TET]

Actually looks like a decent player tbh.

I think he miles better than Alfie, imo

so I expect him to be a zillion dollar player before end of month

 

[Gary67]

Roofe is decent though injury prone. Was a winger at Oxford and when he signed for Leeds, Bielsa played him as a striker and he had a very good first half to the 18-19 season. Missed 20 games for Anderlecht through injury.
They've just announced another striker signed, Cedric Itten from St Gallen, 3 Swiss caps (Ajeti has 10 and is younger), no idea what he's like.

 

[boab1916]

im sure they will be allowed to imperfectly register him and pay him off the books, that way they can shaft the taxman and offer him to everyone and anyone for 50million+

No need to run a club as a business since clubs are separate from their legal owners and cannot die.

A company is a legal entity. An ethereal “spirit” of a football club is not.

By the UEFA definition therefore Rangers Football Club PLC, now RFC 2012 PLC (oldco) was the legal entity [a company] responsible for a football team [Rangers] participating in national and international competitions and which was a registered member of the SFA.

Oldco was a football club until 14th June at which time it sold all of the assets and business to Sevco. As the August report by the Administrators says:-

The sale of the business and certain assets included the sale of the Company’s right, title and interest in its SPL share and SFA membership. Following the sale of these assets, the sale of Ibrox and Murray Park and the transfer of the Playing Staff to Newco the Company was no longer in a position to meet the criteria for membership of any of the Football Authorities and therefore no longer operates a Football club.

What about “Rangers”, the football team?

It is not a legal entity.

It might be argued that it fulfils the remaining criteria, but it fails to get over the first hurdle. It is not a legal entity.

Now we have the Rangers Football Club Ltd, formerly Sevco Scotland Ltd or newco.

It fulfils the definition above too, at least now, as it is a legal entity responsible for a football team.

However, it was not a member of the SFA until 3rd August. Therefore newco was not a football club within the UEFA definition until then.

The question arising from this definition is how the football team, Rangers, operated by a football club, oldco, can still be the same team now operated by a different club, newco, where there was a hiatus of almost two months during which time there was no “football club” responsible for Rangers!

 

[JamesPearson88]

Celtic shouldn't be buying for buying sakes but the pissing about with Toney and the potential capture of Steven Fletcher. Buying Barkas is steps forward and then we lower our expectations on other parts of the park and it's like a few steps back.

 

[Theverdict1]

Im.hearing that club that have gone bust 875,675 times have just spent £4m on a player.

Is it next Tuesday they go bust or is it the Friday?

 

[boab1916]

Im.hearing that club that have gone bust 875,675 times have just spent £4m on a player.

Is it next Tuesday they go bust or is it the Friday?

9 million for two if you are on Clyde with the sun journalist.

 

[Bellshill bhoy]

A company is a legal entity. An ethereal “spirit” of a football club is not.

By the UEFA definition therefore Rangers Football Club PLC, now RFC 2012 PLC (oldco) was the legal entity [a company] responsible for a football team [Rangers] participating in national and international competitions and which was a registered member of the SFA.

Oldco was a football club until 14th June at which time it sold all of the assets and business to Sevco. As the August report by the Administrators says:-

The sale of the business and certain assets included the sale of the Company’s right, title and interest in its SPL share and SFA membership. Following the sale of these assets, the sale of Ibrox and Murray Park and the transfer of the Playing Staff to Newco the Company was no longer in a position to meet the criteria for membership of any of the Football Authorities and therefore no longer operates a Football club.

What about “Rangers”, the football team?

It is not a legal entity.

It might be argued that it fulfils the remaining criteria, but it fails to get over the first hurdle. It is not a legal entity.

Now we have the Rangers Football Club Ltd, formerly Sevco Scotland Ltd or newco.

It fulfils the definition above too, at least now, as it is a legal entity responsible for a football team.

However, it was not a member of the SFA until 3rd August. Therefore newco was not a football club within the UEFA definition until then.

The question arising from this definition is how the football team, Rangers, operated by a football club, oldco, can still be the same team now operated by a different club, newco, where there was a hiatus of almost two months during which time there was no “football club” responsible for Rangers!

But we know all this, your preaching to the converted, away over to follow follow and paste that into EVERY thread gies us aw a laugh