The new manager will be...

J.J. is now stating that David Moyes has the job and this will be announced at 4pm on Monday.

Hmmmmm. :unsure:
I just read something about a rumoured road closure around Paradise on Monday. If !Moyes has the job, the only need for a road closure would be for the protest going by the opinion of most here. I really don't believe it would be needed for a welcome party for David Moyes.
 
My money is on Lennon.

I do believe Celtic can in this moment afford big name. I do believe they could fund him to tune of 50 Million plus sales of current staff.

But I think it would be madness.

Like signing dick Advocaat, the operation costs would be blown out the water bringing in the higher quality players required by a Mourinho.

So short term it can work, but long term it could end up terminal with a couple of high price flops stranded in the less than competitive Scottish market.

The marginal utility of the big name manager without big name players is a negative net present value investment instantly.

The marginal utility of the higher wages is inversely proportional to the gains achieved by those higher wages.

It takes a manager suited to the Scottish market with added value to compete for the best of the best of the non subsidised leagues.

Hiring a manager who earned his grade in a subsidised market makes him a rookie in a non subsidised market unless he earned his corn successfully there prior to the big leagues.

Neil Lennon is the only man who ticks the most important boxes for me.

Even if it cost us 10 million to get him in. Neil would be my choice. The fact he is free is no brainer.

Adds value on off the pitch, but always adds value.

Knows Scottish market

Is an actual fan and tries his hardest

Hate figure for MSM for being Irish catholic who loves Ireland.

Good sense of humour

Good honest communicator

Oh and has kept the dream alive, where Brendan saw loadsa money.
 
I just read something about a rumoured road closure around Paradise on Monday. If !Moyes has the job, the only need for a road closure would be for the protest going by the opinion of most here. I really don't believe it would be needed for a welcome party for David Moyes.
Half of Glasgow will be greetin in pain, the other half in joy. Real chance of flooding on London Road. Just advance prep?
 
I wonder if this is read by the board, sitting there in their ivory tower, quaffing their Babychams as they have a good chortle at all this fevered speculation and at keeping the fans in the dark yet again. I wonder which one of them will win their 50p wager about how long it could be kept a secret this time.
 
Whit exactly are you after here TET a new manager or a date? :LOL::LOL::LOL:

HH.
I look for honesty in all leadership
But a sense of humour can galvanise a squad rather than fragment it. And if Gerrard assessment of Benitez prior to Rodgers at Liverpool is correct. Benitez is distant character with great tactics but no warmth and therefore not really highly regarded by his ex players.

But rather than a date. Id hang out with Lennon anytime. He is honest and listens but commands enough respect when it matters.
 
Apologies for the length of this post in advance. I started and then got carried away. Much respect and appreciation to anyone that ploughs on to the end!

With some of the speculation reaching almost Clinton Baptiste levels of clairvoyance (impeccable sources claiming that “the manager will be revealed on Monday” and not denying that “the circulated list of candidates may have been interviewed” are the equivalent of Sally Buxton asking if the name “Mason” rings a bell with anyone in a room full of Scottish referees) I wanted to explore the probabilities of what we (sort of) know to try and work out what is most likely to happen. This is all pure conjecture and I’d be happy to be corrected by anyone with an informed position. Up to two weeks ago I would have sworn that it would have been Lennon but I think the board will be aware of the build-up of opinion against this now and will be much more wary.

Budget: based on previous seasons, particularly those where a new manager is appointed I would guess that the budget for player additions will be in the region of £10m to £15m plus whatever can be generated from sales. The football operations budget is unlikely to extend beyond £2.5m per annum for the salary of a new manager and I doubt we’d pay more than £1m to £2m in compensation to secure a manager already in a post.

That probably rules out Mourinho, Villas Boas, Howe and Benitez. All of these “big names” will have multiple job offers and don’t need to take a post at Celtic on reduced wages and a restricted player transfer budget to prove anything. I appreciate that Brendan Rodgers would have been one of these names three years ago, but it’s difficult to say whether he arrived because of a connection to the club or because he saw it as an easy rehabilitation back to the EPL. I doubt any of the current crop would see it this way now, possibly Villas Boas at a pinch if he is harbouring a desire to return to the EPL.

The remaining pool of candidates could, for argument’s sake, be divided into the following three categories:

• Rising Stars: managers in roles with small to medium league sides who have achieved moderate success playing a relatively attractive style of football. Within this category I’d put Preudhomme, Cocu and van dem Brom.

• Rejects: former big names who have crashed and burned too badly to be allowed an easy route back to an elite club. This category would include Moyes, Garcia, Pulis, Pardew, Bilic and Martin O’Neill (sorry Martin, you are still a legend, nevertheless).

• Reconnects: managers on manageable wages that have a connection to the club, however tenuous, including Lennon, Michael O’Neill, Ross and Clarke.

In order to try and whittle down the larger pool, I’ve tried to guess the factors that might influence the decision making process of Celtic’s plc board.

Self-Preservation: I think it’s unlikely that anyone at Celtic wants to see the football operation fail simply to achieve one season’s worth of bonuses. Whilst Peter Lawwell could undoubtedly walk into a number of other highly paid senior corporate roles, his position at Celtic is one of almost unique privilege and glamour in Scotland and it would be surprising if he wanted to risk losing it. To extrapolate, if he takes what is seen as a cheap (Lennon or Clarke, before he became Scotland manager) or leftfield (Ronnie Deila) option and ended up losing the league next season, the effect on season ticket sales could be absolutely disastrous, with no 10 in a row to go for and a prevailing sense of negativity about the direction of the club. Given his general lack of popularity, there would certainly be a question over whether he could survive such a fallout. So I would expect that he is under severe personal pressure to get it right. As a result, I don’t think we’ll see anything other than a known quantity, which can only mean Lennon, Ross, Michael O’Neill, or one of the Rejects getting the position, unless there is a realistic suggestion for a Rising Star that I am unaware of at present - those already connected (by the bookies and bloggers) have very recent failures on their hands, otherwise they’d be on their way to La Liga, the Bundesliga, Serie A or the EPL.

Style: by appointing first Deila and then Rodgers it would seem that the general direction of travel that the Celtic plc board is in favour of is a high pressing (and therefore high fitness) and expansive passing game. Assuming that they don’t want to regress to practical, physical football (which would of course require a number of player sales and additions to balance our existing squad of lightweights) we need a manager who would play to that style. On the face of it, that would rule out Moyes, Pulis, Pardew (sort of), Martin O’Neill and, if we’re honest, Lennon.

That leaves Garcia and Bilic, who would both still represent a risk, Jack Ross, who’s probably going to require significant compensation to prise away from Sunderland, and… Michael O’Neill. He stated his commitment to Northern Ireland’s international team just a few days ago, so who better to continue Brendan Rodgers’ legacy of deceit and become the next full time manager of the world’s greatest football club.

The next Celtic manager will be Michael O’Neill. The spirits told me so.
You've made it bigman........
https://thecelticstar.com/the-next-...oneill-the-spirits-told-me-so-ferris-bueller/
 
I look for honesty in all leadership
But a sense of humour can galvanise a squad rather than fragment it. And if Gerrard assessment of Benitez prior to Rodgers at Liverpool is correct. Benitez is distant character with great tactics but no warmth and therefore not really highly regarded by his ex players.

But rather than a date. Id hang out with Lennon anytime. He is honest and listens but commands enough respect when it matters.

Appreciate you explaining your reasoning mate but it was just a wee joke ;)(y)

Will address your points though since you took the time to make them.

I'm not jumping on the Benitez Bus here (as I think it's pie in the sky) but Gerrard is a dullard who maybe has a bit of an axe to grind where Benitez is concerned so I wouldn't put too much stock in what that gimp has to say about the man.

Even if Benitez was a little distant it's not necessarily a bad thing. MON was a stand-offish type manager, he mostly left the day to day coaching to John Robertson and Steve Walford, that distance gave MON a kind of gravitas with the players which resulted in them being a bit in awe of him. They responded to his style with a mixture of respect, fear and wanting to please 'The Boss' and it worked out well for Celtic given his record. Also look at BR, he was Mr Hands-on but turned out to be a treacherous c*nt!

As for the sense of humour thing, well while I'm not saying he doesn't have one but a good sense of humour isn't necessarily something I'd associate with Lenny 'the manager' I don't doubt Lenny 'the person' may be a good laugh but it's not really his style as a manager. Not entirely a bad thing though as being all jokey and chummy with the players could lead to a blurring of the lines between boss and player and lead to a breakdown in the necessary respect being shown.

All in all I just want the best possible manager we can get, I don't agree with your good self and others that Lenny is that man but that's just my personal take on it. What I will say though is if they do go with Lenny then the board will need a massive change in attitude towards their transfer strategy, if they think they can bring in Lenny and just carry on with the 'project' type signings and not spending significant money then they're seriously deluding themselves in what's required and putting the 9 & 10 at serious risk.

HH mate (y)
 
Appreciate you explaining your reasoning mate but it was just a wee joke ;)(y)

Will address your points though since you took the time to make them.

I'm not jumping on the Benitez Bus here (as I think it's pie in the sky) but Gerrard is a dullard who maybe has a bit of an axe to grind where Benitez is concerned so I wouldn't put too much stock in what that gimp has to say about the man.

Even if Benitez was a little distant it's not necessarily a bad thing. MON was a stand-offish type manager, he mostly left the day to day coaching to John Robertson and Steve Walford, that distance gave MON a kind of gravitas with the players which resulted in them being a bit in awe of him. They responded to his style with a mixture of respect, fear and wanting to please 'The Boss' and it worked out well for Celtic given his record. Also look at BR, he was Mr Hands-on but turned out to be a treacherous c*nt!

As for the sense of humour thing, well while I'm not saying he doesn't have one but a good sense of humour isn't necessarily something I'd associate with Lenny 'the manager' I don't doubt Lenny 'the person' may be a good laugh but it's not really his style as a manager. Not entirely a bad thing though as being all jokey and chummy with the players could lead to a blurring of the lines between boss and player and lead to a breakdown in the necessary respect being shown.

All in all I just want the best possible manager we can get, I don't agree with your good self and others that Lenny is that man but that's just my personal take on it. What I will say though is if they do go with Lenny then the board will need a massive change in attitude towards their transfer strategy, if they think they can bring in Lenny and just carry on with the 'project' type signings and not spending significant money then they're seriously deluding themselves in what's required and putting the 9 & 10 at serious risk.

HH mate (y)

Respectful as always my friend. Good post ??
 
Back
Top