Maybe, but maybe not. Bear in mind that I've only been a fan since the 2016 season, so I may have missed better transfer windows, but overall I think we do all right every time, despite a tight-fisted board who needs to lighten up and spend some money. Even now, despite the wailing and gnashing of teeth every transfer window brings when we don't end up with -- oh, I don't know -- Messi or Neymar or the-flavor-of-the-month -- the fact of the matter is when the window closes, we do OK.
Not great, but not bad as everyone seems to make it out to be either.
Remember, it's sad but true, but players are not rushing to Scotland. Any player worth a damn knows that the league is a haven for hammerthrowing troglodytes, and those we may be trying to get to play here realize that. One only has to see how slammed Jeremie Frimpong got while playing for us before playing, quite successfully, at Bayer Leverkusen. So whomever Celtic has on its radar is going to want a lot of money to come to not-so-greener pastures, so to speak.
Regardless, this window doesn't look too bad honestly. Two goalkeepers to bolster an already adequate staff of Messrs. Bain and Siegrist (unless the latter has buggered off unbeknownst to me), it looks like Bernardo is coming back, and I have a feeling Norwich City will finally let go of Idah. But even if the Idah plan doesn't work out, we don't really know what Rodgers and/or the board has up the collective sleeves. I personally will wait until the window closes to make an assessment.
Is that as fun as bitching and moaning about who we're getting and who we're not getting? Admittedly, no. But it is what it is.
More to the point of this topic, however, success to me is winning the league, getting trebles if possible, and exiting the Champions League as late as possible, because as much as it could be lucrative to win the league every year and go on to the Champions League -- that UEFA money is really nice -- the Champions League and Europa League are, in my opinion, an extracurricular nuisance.
I get what you are saying Larry, but I'd argue that many of our transfer windows after Rodgers' first big splurge - with the notable exception of the ones when Ange was here and PL was absent (I'll let you decide which of these two factors were most important) - have been too slow/last minute, reactionary, haphazardly unfocused and far too often a downgrade on the players we sold. Yes, we still dominate domestic football, as we should based on our superior financial position and coaches we can bring in, but we seriously underperform in Europe. I think too many of our successes have been despite our transfer activities rather than because of them.
I don't think any realistic fan expects us to be bringing in established stars, as financially we cannot compete with low-end EPL/Spanish/German/Italian/French sides who love to hoard 30+ squad players and dozens of youth players. But we need to invest in less projects and spend the same amount of money (or even a wee bit more) on fewer players who have a little bit more experience than the massive gambles we insist on buying almost exclusively. There is a place for the odd one or two of these each season but not 6 to 10 every summer. Bringing in players like Sinclair, CCV, Mooy, Juranovic, AJ, Gordon, Hart & Commons show how successful this can be - of course, there are no guarantees as Duffy & Barkas showed, but these can be excused to an extent due to the unique situation of the Covid lockdown.
Plus we always leave it far too late. So we end up playing vital European matches with a team full of often not match-fit strangers with the inevitable consequences. Not only do we routinely under-perform, but we also miss out of massive cash rewards by continually dropping points. This also has a very negative affect on our future participation in European football as we fail to pick up co-efficient points which would propel us into a higher ranking. Very few fans are really expecting us to go on and get to the latter stages of the Champions League these days, but avoiding the annual humiliations would be nice. We will struggle to compete with the much richer clubs in the same way that our domestic opponents cannot keep up with us, but you can still give the giants an occasional bloody nose, and give the fans special memories. There are plenty of examples of clubs of a lower stature than Celtic doing much much better in Europe than we have in the last decade or more - that should be our target rather than sulking in a corner because Southampton can poach our better players, or sitting smugly in padded seats in the Main Stand slapping each others' backs for huge profits while being shown up on the pitch.
Yes, Scottish football is far too brutal compared to most other places, but I'm not too sure that it plays too big a part in us being able to attract players to us. It is maybe more of an issue in being able to keep skilful players at our club though.
The players we end up buying are far too often what's left that are available in the last couple of days that teams want to offload, rather than targeting specific styles of affordable players who will fit our manager's system we end up with players who have a potential but have failed in positions that we simply do not need to much. The failure to bring in a left back is the most recent example of this madness and shear negligence.
Although movement has been slow so far this summer, I like our strategy for the two goalies we are bringing in. That actually shows a short-term strategy in conjunction with a long-term strategy so I hope that it pays off for us, as it is a very pleasant change.
I hope you are keeping well, pal. But I'm not sure there is a need for your positivity on here while us crabbit shitehouses are enjoying our whinging!!!