What Message Would You Like to Send to Peter Lawwell and the Celtic Board

TET

Well-known member
Your words were up to McNeil not after and I didnt mistake McNeil for o'Neil either. All those former managers youve mentioned, if course they are legends of the club. Still the record books will always show what Rodgers did for us and (I honestly don't want to be going in circles with you TET) that's an irrefutable fact , domestically he took us to a level never seen before not for a long long time. You are entitled to dismiss his achievements as your opinion is as valid as anyones on here. Aye I just want wins though I care about how we achieve them I'd like a return to the swashbuckling displays like the last one v sevco we should've won by a mile. The performance wasnt lacking the result? Do you think anyone cares about how we get our results in this season? Do you think that supporters are saying Rogers almost broke the club? None thatvi know apart from your good self . Anyway TET I dont want an argument or another debate on something you and I have gone over more than enough times. So I put it to you that you have your opinion and you are entitled to it. I have my opinion and I'm also entitled to it. Can we call it quits and let's just agree to disagree? You must be as bored as I am going round in circles , the past is the past and the healing process must begin and it wont if we keep looking back so I'll leave it out if you are prepared to do the same . Fair enough? Agree to disagree? HH ☘
I am always willing to disagree, at no point have I ever tried to say my opinion is more valid than yours. Anytime I add anything is when the something I haven't said or at least tried to express has been recommunicated in a way that I was never intending.

My final observation is that any man who is a known shyster who achieved anything purely through spending monstrous amounts of money can never be called a great in my opinion.

I am very happy to put this debate to bed, and I thank you kindly for your debate on the subject.

Results are good, good management which includes instilling an ethos thats based on cardinal virtues is better even if in short term they dont win.

Generally society has become poorer for the shysters and they still seem to come out smelling of roses especially if they do the shyster thing and feck off once they done maximum damage, in full knowledge that popular opinion will give him the credit for other peoples hard work and let someone else carry the can for all their shysterness.

You think he was great. fine

Im absolutely certain he is a capitalistic shyster who can polish his turds as clean as his rotten core teeth.
 

Winter

Well-known member
I am always willing to disagree, at no point have I ever tried to say my opinion is more valid than yours. Anytime I add anything is when the something I haven't said or at least tried to express has been recommunicated in a way that I was never intending.

My final observation is that any man who is a known shyster who achieved anything purely through spending monstrous amounts of money can never be called a great in my opinion.

I am very happy to put this debate to bed, and I thank you kindly for your debate on the subject.

Results are good, good management which includes instilling an ethos thats based on cardinal virtues is better even if in short term they dont win.

Generally society has become poorer for the shysters and they still seem to come out smelling of roses especially if they do the shyster thing and feck off once they done maximum damage, in full knowledge that popular opinion will give him the credit for other peoples hard work and let someone else carry the can for all their shysterness.

You think he was great. fine

Im absolutely certain he is a capitalistic shyster who can polish his turds as clean as his rotten core teeth.
Brilliant I'll take that as agree to disagree 🙂
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top