Sevco v Champions at Asbestosdome, Sun 7-Apr-24 at noon. MIB=Beaton VAR=Walsh

Anyone who thinks Beaton was cheating today has to take off there green glasses (I never even brought up the ref I just said silva is a cheat and a prick) ref didn’t have a bad game tho…..we have had the board not wanting us to win league to the spl been anti Irish or anti catholic to all the refs been members of the orange lodge but sometimes it’s our own fault that we don’t win a game and today it was bad defending ….fuck been a ref in this country ….we played well first half but second half we flung it away but least its in our hands ☘️
I'll take off my green tinted glasses the same day Beaton takes off his blue tinted ones. The difference is I'm a rabid fan who watches the fitba, whereas he is a rabid fan with a whistle and yellow card who makes game influencing decisions in every game he participates in.

I think we can all agree that once they got a foothold in the game then our defence became very poor. But to deny Beaton and Walsh's influence in allowing them to get back in the game is something we'll have to disagree on.
 
How MANY Fukin times did Oddbod & Sterling faw on the baw when challenged & then Beathun blew.. Gave us Fuk Aw!! 🤬🤬🤬.. They'll get a pen in EVERY game they're struggling in so we MUST win last 6!!
Remember Goldson being caught on the ball ,falls on his arse,Celtic player doesnt touch him,gets the freekick.I clock everything mate this isn't paranoia that ref is worth the watching no cunts telling me any different.
 
He gave us a penalty and chopped off a rangers goal …chopping off that goal took some amount of balls …..a will give him credit today on a difficult game to referee (not saying he had a great game but he wasn’t pro rangers today)
Like yourself, tommybhoy, I don't get too fussed about refereeing bias. The only one I find it hard to believe is impartial, is John Beaton. The man's record is really there for everyone to see.
It's not just the obvious decisions that influence a game.

VAR got him out of jail today.
 
Beaton got their penalty call correct first time. He was no more than a few yards away and saw the ball divert, AJ getting a touch, and Silva go down, a dive.
What Celtic should be requesting is the footage Beaton was shown on the VAR screen, and what was the audio between him and Walsh that changed his mind.
There is an angle that show conclusively that AJ flicks the ball away with his right foot just before Silva dived and his knee collides with AJ's foot. Did Beaton see that? If he did then what's his reasoning for changing his mind? If not, why not?
It seems to me that we see better angles from Sky cameras in televised games than the referees are using to make decisions.
Like Robertson got the Yang yellow card correct before VAR changed his mind, he was 5 yards from the incident, VAR is re-refereeing games for incidents which are not clear and obvious errors.
It's a shambles and is showing up our incompetent officials for what they are. Its giving them 2 chances to reach the wrong decision.
 
Like yourself, tommybhoy, I don't get too fussed about refereeing bias. The only one I find it hard to believe is impartial, is John Beaton. The man's record is really there for everyone to see.
It's not just the obvious decisions that influence a game.

VAR got him out of jail today.
Fur sure m8, he's NEVER giving us a pen waeoot VAR & allows their 2nd goal even tho it's a CLEAR free kick!! He's a CHEATING HUN BASTARD & will gie them at least ANOTHER 2 pens b4 Season ends!! 🤬🤬🤬
 
Beaton got their penalty call correct first time. He was no more than a few yards away and saw the ball divert, AJ getting a touch, and Silva go down, a dive.
What Celtic should be requesting is the footage Beaton was shown on the VAR screen, and what was the audio between him and Walsh that changed his mind.
There is an angle that show conclusively that AJ flicks the ball away with his right foot just before Silva dived and his knee collides with AJ's foot. Did Beaton see that? If he did then what's his reasoning for changing his mind? If not, why not?
It seems to me that we see better angles from Sky cameras in televised games than the referees are using to make decisions.
Like Robertson got the Yang yellow card correct before VAR changed his mind, he was 5 yards from the incident, VAR is re-refereeing games for incidents which are not clear and obvious errors.
It's a shambles and is showing up our incompetent officials for what they are. Its giving them 2 chances to reach the wrong decision.
kinetic energy, biased belief?
 
Beaton got their penalty call correct first time. He was no more than a few yards away and saw the ball divert, AJ getting a touch, and Silva go down, a dive.
What Celtic should be requesting is the footage Beaton was shown on the VAR screen, and what was the audio between him and Walsh that changed his mind.
There is an angle that show conclusively that AJ flicks the ball away with his right foot just before Silva dived and his knee collides with AJ's foot. Did Beaton see that? If he did then what's his reasoning for changing his mind? If not, why not?
It seems to me that we see better angles from Sky cameras in televised games than the referees are using to make decisions.
Like Robertson got the Yang yellow card correct before VAR changed his mind, he was 5 yards from the incident, VAR is re-refereeing games for incidents which are not clear and obvious errors.
It's a shambles and is showing up our incompetent officials for what they are. Its giving them 2 chances to reach the wrong decision.

Those on VAR have the option of showing footage that is advantageous to their agenda…..these subjective views benefit those who are in a position to decide what views the viewer sees….and there lies the problem…
 

Members online

Latest posts

Back
Top