Theverdict1
Well-known member
You defend the indefensible. My disgust at the hierarchy is different because Catholic people deserved better. If the church had been a secular org it would have been closedd down. Three guys hire prostitute's with Oxfam and it nearly killed it. I'm just happy my mother never lived to see the shite that went on. Francis is trying to sort it and I have a lot of time for the man, but, that doesn't alter the utter moral bankruptcy of those in control throughout the last 39 years or more. They new what was going on and made it fucking worse. I have no problem with people who are Catholic, I have a problem with those who betrayed them. And you should too.1. Thompson isn't an established hack? Dont understand what you mean by that.
2. I also would like this dealt with properly.
3. We have lived through the utter shame of the church.
This statement needs clarification. On the one hand you claim we live in a country that has misleading MSM with an agenda against the church.
I agree
But that certainly could mean the Church propaganda peddled is selective in its reporting. There are many problems in the church and it is established fact that Masonic and Communist (usually connected) factions infiltrate the church to bring it into disrepute. On top of that predators can use the church for their trust and abuse it.
That does not make the entire church corrupt, so I resent the way you chose to be selective in another attack on the church with misleading invective. You claim to want the truth but chose very selective criteria to back.
Any criminal churchmen should be highlighted and defrocked and hand to secular courts (imo) but the hard bit is detecting them, when you live a countries who are willing to tarnish every bishop with the dung of a few.
4. How did it turn out for Ratzinger? Are you alluding to some fantasy stuff like the horde with this calumny? If not I would like to read your established hack account of the resignation of pope. Again another underhanded (Hunnish conspiracy bollocks perhaps) attack on stuff you claim to have superior knowledge?
5 I would suggest you are regularly digging your head in the sand but extremely bigoted against the church. And thus haven't actually read it without your bigoted specs on.
6. Nobody at Celtic is currently culpable for past crimes???? That again would be a strange assertion from a man who categorically castigates the church with propaganda but thinks abuse committed in past at Celtic is not our problem.
Any abuse past or present that occurred by anyone of trust should be dealt with first by sacking them then criminally prosecuting them and if individuals who were aware about it and chose to do no real investigation (if no real ivestigation took place) should also be handed over to the criminal authorities.
This crap spouted about it being a catholic issue is just as heinous as blaming Celtic for knowing bout stuff.
Its a universal problem that includes every faith and none. Plenty of atheist peadophiles exist btw
They usually fly below radar in positions that they feel can help them evade detection, by doing it at companies/ institutions that will lose big reputation if its got hold of by the propaganda machine that wants to tarnish them.
Now just like the real huns who detest Catholic Church cause of their bigoted misinformation from early age. You too have declared yourself a bigot, again with some very false and misleading invective.
Are you aware thats also a criminal offence to be openly bigoted based on secret knowledge you claim everyone should know about?
How is your attack different from the FF shite?