Does Rule 200 Highlight Scottish Referees Subversion?

[Celtic By Numbers]

http://celticbynumberscom.ipage.com/does-rule-200-highlight-scottish-referee-subversion/

Celtic have been impacted by rule 200 more than any other club. Studying how it has been used illustrates the need for a second line of defence to monitor the refs.

 

[Maria]

Fantastic Work CBN. ????

 

[Millsy]

Email this to the SFA , the GASL , the SMSM , John Fleming .....

 

[JamSam67]

Wow the thing about stats they don’t lie unlike the SFA and the Mibs. Nice to see the usual suspects the Masonic Inbred Brothers o Sevco. Great post CBN.

HH

 

[Shadow2]

Just shows the absolute brass neck of those at Ibrokes eh! Frothing about retrospective punishment being dished out to their players while completely ignoring the fact that the refs have been doing them a favour by letting the thuggery of their players go unpunished until after the 90 mins are up.

Plenty of games were they should have seen straight reds but were allowed to keep 11 players on the pitch yet somehow they're being hard done by fuck off!!!!!

That lot don't think they should be held accountable for anything they do wrong because they are 'da peepul' whatever the fuck that means! Clownheads.

 

[Richybhoy]

The numbers don't lie. I have always thought a proper statistical study of Scottish football would reveal much about the corrupt nature of the game here. I would pay particular attention to penalties. Match winning or point winning penalties especially. I would compare it with two or three leagues of a similar size for balance. There are other calculations that can indicate whether the results are random or significant. Significant meaning something is influencing the numbers.
I would also like to know what Bookies think about mibbery too. How do they work out odds for games when it's common knowledge that certain refs are cheats?
HH Rich