Hibs v Celtic - Match Thread, all comments here

kellys were a private company like sevco

the board now are plc and running club like business since thats only way you can grow and sustain growth
their accounts are fully audited by top auditors and every penny is accountable

under kellys we didn't even run as a successful business

unless your protected by the hidden hand you cant run a massive club without massive income

and its not available to us even if we won CL

we would not earn what bottom of league in epl gets from tv

they get 100 million from tv

top gets 250 million from tv

we get 4 million

thats the reality

how do you compete with that imbalance more than we currently do?
 
The top guys chose a puppet, they provided him with lots of strings but . they were pulled by the economics and political ideals of people who are on a different planet, most here are eclipsed
 
You give reasoned arguments , but in this case I see none
we would be bankrupt in 1 season with another rodgers

elyounousi wage is 55k per week

and I dont rate him

ff 77 k per week

do rate him but our max wage is around 25k before bonuses

And thats 10 times any other SPL team apart from one who runs on deludamol finance

our wages total per season are above 50 million

second place in league would see us earn less than our wages

but the most we can earn is 100 million or thereabouts total

if players are on double money for reaching cl

then wages are 100 million

and that before you increase it with bigger budgets

Thats what deludamol finance looks like

even if you do well in europe you run at massive loss

thats what your asking club to do
 
The top guys chose a puppet, they provided him with lots of strings but . they were pulled by the economics and political ideals of people who are on a different planet, most here are eclipsed
I would suggest you take closer look at the financials

they are on max risk before deludamol

your asking for more

thats sae as asking for deludamol

if not explain how your better system works

cause it cant work with big tv contracts imo
 
you must work for sky tv? thats the sort of shit they come out with
no its you who are making bold claims like no ambition

second rate managers

more ambition

what finances your ambition and how much does it return


we tried the upper wage range and needed to sell to break even

so is that ambitious

selling best players to cover the massive wage bill for players who are still underpaid but get more than we can afford

what bit dont you understand

we are maxed out on risk

anything more is deludamol levels and no better return than sevco profits which are zero

which means you go burst or you sell

thats why rodgers fecked off

he cant manage properly in league without subsidy, imo
 
lol tet, no ambition is obvious, with NL the same, its not about wages it about motivation, i understand nothing, you are the god :p
no its not obvious

so be specific

what does ambition look like and cost in your opinion

im suggesting your ambition is same as sevco deludamol

and fact you cant be specific proves its not obvious

not even to you, you are ambitious
 
we have the best players, you explain why they dont prove it?
the tactics are gash

and the manager needs to go

they are better but not by enough to win every game

maybe 10 percent better but paid 1000 percent more

overpaid for us

yet underpaid for their talent if epl is the standard

to get 10 percent better than our team you need good tactics and/or 100 million more per season

because thats the amount of shortfall we need to compete with bottom epl team for players
 
Back
Top