TET
Well-known member
peace and thank you for the hand shakeIn your second post on the subject, you hit me with a 750 word post, several list of bullet points, requests for more information on specifics and so on. If the comment about the youtube video was facetious, that's why.
I know it's probably pretty basic, but my theory is simply based on the fact that we had a lot of money sitting in the bank and have been going into games without players. That isn't the best use of resources as far as I can figure out and I don't think I need to do spending projections and so on. It might not meet the required standard for someone who delves in numbers, but that's my opinion.
I don't think we have to spend more than we have. I don't think we even have to spend all of what we have. I do think we should not be sitting on a pile of cash twice the size of Walter White's when we are playing players in the wrong positions.
I don't think it'll lead us to oblivion like the huns. I think investing in players will give us a better chance of qualifying and earning more money. I don't think that's a particularly controversial opinion, although I'm sure others will differ.
Anyway, apologies from my side also. These internet rammies can escalate quickly!
appreciated
And if I came across as a nutter its coz I am in cell 15 ward h Broadmoor