That other team ,ower there

Can anyone tell me the purpose of Kent? The ref and linesmen are out to help sevco as much free kicks? A off side against the Well that wasnā€™t? Cannot beleave that this is exceptable even if you donā€™t know a thing about football you can see what is going on it just makes me angry as a ex ref that the so called ref is so obviously one sideded not looking forward to second half as we know whatā€™s comeing thank God Iā€™m a Celtic supporter
His proper use is to kick the shit out him every time u see him....oh u mean on the pitch ah fuck knows matešŸ˜œ
 
Was going to put this on the laughter thread--- but, well you decide - - - -
Watching Sky Sports news a major sponsor of our league and they have just informed us all that Callum McGregor pulled of a great safe for "rangers", obviously wrong on 2 counts, but ffs is it asking too much for them to get the players right šŸ˜³šŸ˜³šŸ˜³.
 
310841103_636736054719860_5946757581769072599_n.jpg
 
two poor teams one helped by the the men in black the other frightened to tackle a blue shirt even when no contact was made it went against them wonder how they are going to cope next week?? The Well goal was a cracker
Wonder how theyā€™ll play against us on Wednesday ? The thugs will be full throttle kicking anyone running in a hoops top Theyā€™ll be just as rotten I hope
 
Interesting......

American investor Kyle Fox has doubled down on her intentions to buy a huge stake in Rangers ā€“ after defeating the Ibrox board in a Miami court.

Miss Fox was hit with a lawsuit by the clubā€™s hierarchy after holding talks in London with vice chairman John Bennett about a potential takeover plan. The legal action was aborted after two months of wrangling last week when lawyers representing Rangers confirmed the case against her had been voluntarily dropped.

But Fox responded to the development last night by confirming that she still intends to snap up a ā€˜significant ownership interestā€™ in the club. Record Sport understands the Florida based investor has agreements in place to hoover up a stake of between 25-30 per cent at 40p per share - which would make her the clubā€™s biggest single shareholder. Her plan was put on hold after being dragged into court by the incumbent Ibrox board.

But Fox insisted at that time she would press ahead with the deal as soon as the legal action was booted out of court. That happened last Thursday in the States when Rangers folded their own case after lawyers representing Foxā€™s firm KRF Capital demanded it was dismissed.

And a bullish Fox said: ā€œI have always been, and will continue to be, open and transparent with Rangersā€™ board, shareholders, and investors. I look forward to putting the lawsuit behind us and continuing to explore opportunities to bring value to the Rangers organisation, its loyal fans, investors, and other stakeholders through KRF Capitalā€™s proposed acquisition of a significant ownership interest in the club.ā€

Fox had initially proposed to buy a 75 per cent controlling stake in Rangers but this was met with hostility by chairman Douglas Park and his directors - who insisted they have no wish to sell up. She then advised them of an alternative strategy to acquire around 25 per cent instead, while insisting that other shareholders were willing to strike a deal.

It was at that point that the club launched legal action against KRF Capital - accusing Fox of unauthorised use of a club crest in a document related to her proposal and insisting Rangers were not for sale. Foxā€™s lawyers pointed out ā€œfactual and legal deficienciesā€ of Rangersā€™ claims ā€“ including that the club is a UK public company with freely transferable shares.

The club was forced to withdraw many of its allegations before ultimately dropping the case.
 
Interesting......

American investor Kyle Fox has doubled down on her intentions to buy a huge stake in Rangers ā€“ after defeating the Ibrox board in a Miami court.

Miss Fox was hit with a lawsuit by the clubā€™s hierarchy after holding talks in London with vice chairman John Bennett about a potential takeover plan. The legal action was aborted after two months of wrangling last week when lawyers representing Rangers confirmed the case against her had been voluntarily dropped.

But Fox responded to the development last night by confirming that she still intends to snap up a ā€˜significant ownership interestā€™ in the club. Record Sport understands the Florida based investor has agreements in place to hoover up a stake of between 25-30 per cent at 40p per share - which would make her the clubā€™s biggest single shareholder. Her plan was put on hold after being dragged into court by the incumbent Ibrox board.

But Fox insisted at that time she would press ahead with the deal as soon as the legal action was booted out of court. That happened last Thursday in the States when Rangers folded their own case after lawyers representing Foxā€™s firm KRF Capital demanded it was dismissed.

And a bullish Fox said: ā€œI have always been, and will continue to be, open and transparent with Rangersā€™ board, shareholders, and investors. I look forward to putting the lawsuit behind us and continuing to explore opportunities to bring value to the Rangers organisation, its loyal fans, investors, and other stakeholders through KRF Capitalā€™s proposed acquisition of a significant ownership interest in the club.ā€

Fox had initially proposed to buy a 75 per cent controlling stake in Rangers but this was met with hostility by chairman Douglas Park and his directors - who insisted they have no wish to sell up. She then advised them of an alternative strategy to acquire around 25 per cent instead, while insisting that other shareholders were willing to strike a deal.

It was at that point that the club launched legal action against KRF Capital - accusing Fox of unauthorised use of a club crest in a document related to her proposal and insisting Rangers were not for sale. Foxā€™s lawyers pointed out ā€œfactual and legal deficienciesā€ of Rangersā€™ claims ā€“ including that the club is a UK public company with freely transferable shares.

The club was forced to withdraw many of its allegations before ultimately dropping the case.
40p a share, she should have no bother finding people willing to offload. Then they have another confetti issue and her 25% is worth 15%

rcMucZforqsbbTYiv519UquvQN4.jpg
 
Interesting......

American investor Kyle Fox has doubled down on her intentions to buy a huge stake in Rangers ā€“ after defeating the Ibrox board in a Miami court.

Miss Fox was hit with a lawsuit by the clubā€™s hierarchy after holding talks in London with vice chairman John Bennett about a potential takeover plan. The legal action was aborted after two months of wrangling last week when lawyers representing Rangers confirmed the case against her had been voluntarily dropped.

But Fox responded to the development last night by confirming that she still intends to snap up a ā€˜significant ownership interestā€™ in the club. Record Sport understands the Florida based investor has agreements in place to hoover up a stake of between 25-30 per cent at 40p per share - which would make her the clubā€™s biggest single shareholder. Her plan was put on hold after being dragged into court by the incumbent Ibrox board.

But Fox insisted at that time she would press ahead with the deal as soon as the legal action was booted out of court. That happened last Thursday in the States when Rangers folded their own case after lawyers representing Foxā€™s firm KRF Capital demanded it was dismissed.

And a bullish Fox said: ā€œI have always been, and will continue to be, open and transparent with Rangersā€™ board, shareholders, and investors. I look forward to putting the lawsuit behind us and continuing to explore opportunities to bring value to the Rangers organisation, its loyal fans, investors, and other stakeholders through KRF Capitalā€™s proposed acquisition of a significant ownership interest in the club.ā€

Fox had initially proposed to buy a 75 per cent controlling stake in Rangers but this was met with hostility by chairman Douglas Park and his directors - who insisted they have no wish to sell up. She then advised them of an alternative strategy to acquire around 25 per cent instead, while insisting that other shareholders were willing to strike a deal.

It was at that point that the club launched legal action against KRF Capital - accusing Fox of unauthorised use of a club crest in a document related to her proposal and insisting Rangers were not for sale. Foxā€™s lawyers pointed out ā€œfactual and legal deficienciesā€ of Rangersā€™ claims ā€“ including that the club is a UK public company with freely transferable shares.

The club was forced to withdraw many of its allegations before ultimately dropping the case.
So the dire rangers paper is saying that a fox is still hanging around looking to put in millions aswell as buying shares at 40p.. moore and hartson apparentley said it was true.. all they are doing is trying to avoid the truth, there will not be a sugermummy on the horizon just lots of funders wanting they're money back.
 
If fox was to buy on the open market (if you can buy them I don't know) then the price would go above 40p and she probably wouldn't get many. as soon as people know there is a buyer the shares for sale would dry up. Hence she (if true) is trying to do a off market purchase.

This is also good if any holder of a large number of confetti that they would like to sell (which would be the opposite to the above paragraph).

I would say king is trying to off load his confetti and hence why she says she can get 25% already.
 
If fox was to buy on the open market (if you can buy them I don't know) then the price would go above 40p and she probably wouldn't get many. as soon as people know there is a buyer the shares for sale would dry up. Hence she (if true) is trying to do a off market purchase.

This is also good if any holder of a large number of confetti that they would like to sell (which would be the opposite to the above paragraph).

I would say king is trying to off load his confetti and hence why she says she can get 25% already.

Yep!

The glib and shameless liar is all over this I reckonā€¦..I would imagine anyone looking to buy a significant amount of Hun shares would be looking to do their due diligence first, and that no doubt scares the Hun Board shitless as they would have to open up the accounts to forensic scrutiny.

And anyone proceeding to acquire a significant amount of their shares would obviously be looking for at least 1 seat on the Hun Board inclusive of Chairman.

And that would open things up to all sort of questions being asked as to deals done and pending, litigation financials (ala Big Mike, etc) commercial contracts (Castore, et al) loans repaid and any still outstanding, football operating status re Financial Fair Play, any potential issues with accounts being signed off as a going concern, etc, etc.

How many Hun Board members have recently jumped ship, and why?

Moving along, what is clearly apparent, is the Huns absolutely need the guarantee of Champions League Football income next year, as they cannot afford to budget to spend decent amounts without this guarantee.

The SFA and Mibbery is well aware of this and they will do all in their insidious power to make this happen.

Keep yer eye on the Scottish Cup draws, as Iā€™m betting they will be every bit as Hun friendly as the League Cup draws were.

Itā€™s going to be 2010 all over again, on steroids, if we as a Club say and do nothing...
 

Members online

Back
Top