boab1916
Well-known member
One of my mob are doing law had a wee flick through one of the books and found thisMy weans 'teaching' me about the Holy Trinity as in P1
Nae mention of Jinky then its aw bullshit
PASSIVE TITLE.
Subject_2 DIVISION IV.
Vitious Intromission.
Subject_3 SECT. VI.
Vitious Intromission Purged by Confirmation, or by declarator of escheat.
Bad
v.
Hamilton
Date: 12 January 1622
Case No. No 191.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Found, That an executor confirmed lite pendente, cannot be farther obliged than secundum vires inventarii and albeit the pursuer reply upon farther intromission and fraudful omission, yet the executor shall not be obliged in solidum, but according to the quantity of the omission.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 45. Kerse, MS. fol. 133.
*** A similar decision was pronounced 14th July 1626, Smith against Gray, No 17. p. 9660.
went back to the Broons annual