Chris Sutton delivers brilliant response to Souness on Ibrox diver

Winning Captains

Administrator
Staff member
Chris Sutton has told Graeme Souness that he’s not god and in doing so provided a much more viable summary of the incident we watched on Sky Sports on Sunday afternoon in the Glasgow Derby. And a word on the former referee that they use on Sky Sports who never seems to come down on Celtic’s side in any incident but always seems to favour the bizarre decisions that go the way of theRangers.

436258039_431039125960813_1120684359195542293_n-1-630x829.jpg


Maybe Sky Sports should look at using an impartial former referee from south of the border rather than one with links to the six counties and a particular club?

One that actually explains the rules of the game. He thought that it was a penalty to theRangers and also that Walsh was wrong to call Beaton back for the foul on Tomoki Iwata which ruled out the Dessers goal. Yet the only difference with the two challenges was Alistair Johnston got the ball! Dermot’s for the watching folks.

“I’m surprised someone who knows the game so well can’t see through a diver… we should be calling it out. Beaton was in a great position and initially books Silva. Walsh re-referees it and thinks it’s clear and obvious… did Walsh see the touch on the ball from Johnston? …mmm,” Chris Sutton posted on social media.

This was just part of his response to Graeme Souness who yesterday attacked Sutton for trying to influence VAR decision-making during the Glasgow Derby at Ibrox after John Beaton had booked Fabio Silva for diving.

rangers-fc-v-celtic-fc-cinch-scottish-premiership-168-630x378.jpg

GLASGOW, SCOTLAND – APRIL 07: Referee John Beaton . (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images) (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)


In his wider retort in an interview with Daily Record, Sutton defends his position magnificently.

“I have a lot of respect for Graeme as a player, manager and pundit. But he is talking utter nonsense to suggest I was trying to somehow influence VAR. It would have been better if Nick Walsh WAS watching Sky Sports – as the officials might have made the right call rather than rewarding cheating.

“I don’t know what he was watching when he called Beaton to the monitor, but it certainly wasn’t the TV coverage. Even in the unlikely event if they were, I’m not sure what kind of power Graeme thinks I wield. Does he think I’m God?! I don’t have that kind of sway unfortunately – give me another few months!

“In seriousness, it wasn’t a Celtic thing or a Rangers thing, I just called that incident as I saw it. If anything I suspect Graeme has the Rangers blinkers on as there is no way he’d think that was a penalty if any other team was involved. And having watched it over and over again, NOTHING has changed my mind about the incident. It is still not a penalty kick.

“Johnston clearly gets a touch on the ball and redirects its path. Silva sees the leg out and takes his chance to throw himself into it. Silva initiated the slight contact and are we supposed to reward simulation or stamp it out?

Celtic manager Brendan Rodgers believes referee John Beaton had originally made the correct decision before VAR awarded Rangers a penalty.

Fabio Silva had been originally booked for diving, but the decision to award a spot kick helped spur a Rangers comeback in the 3-3 draw. pic.twitter.com/KJfr34QshM

— BBC Sport Scotland (@BBCSportScot) April 7, 2024


“He was rolling around all afternoon and this was another example. His behaviour was embarrassing. Beaton was close to the scene and his initial interpretation was spot on.

“He could see it in real time and he was right to show him a yellow card for yet another dive. I just can’t understand why Walsh got involved. The fact people can even debate it means it wasn’t a clear and obvious error from the referee in the first place.”

Only one team is consistently referred like this.

Only one team gets this kind of penalty 99% of the time. This was as blatant a manipulation of a decision as you’re likely to see.

Nobody can trust Scottish referees. Every single one should be emptied and replaced with foreign. pic.twitter.com/bqp80mBQsj

— The Celtic Way (@TheCelticWay3) April 7, 2024


Yesterday Celtic contacted the Scottish FA with concerns over the footage Nick Walsh chose to show John Beaton as the video above points out. There is only a few seconds more in the more accurate footage that shows what actually happened. Beaton it appears did not revisit the incident properly in that VAR review as he did NOT see Alistair Johnston’s touch on the ball.

Meanwhile Celtic supporters must decide how to approach the Scottish Cup semi-final played at the Scottish FA’s ground at Hampden and any appropriate protest after the penalty incidents at Tynecastle, Livingston and now Ibrox.

I’m surprised someone who knows the game so well can’t see through a diver… we should be calling it out. Beaton was in a great position and initially books Silva. Walsh re referees it and thinks it’s clear and obvious… did Walsh see the touch on the ball from Johnston? …mmm https://t.co/PIXPKMJRMz

— Chris Sutton (@chris_sutton73) April 9, 2024



Help raise funds for Celtic Youth Academy by playing the Celtic Pools Weekly Lottery and you could win up to £25,000. The lottery is £1 per week and if you join today you will receive a Premium Boxed Celtic Pen & Pencil Set.

More Stories / Latest News


Compare and contrast – no penalty to Celtic and a penalty awarded to Rangers
Apr 9 2024, 10:08


Visit Celticshorts.com – for short, sharp, Celtic news and commentary – available now
Apr 9 2024, 9:54



Chris Sutton delivers brilliant response to Souness on Ibrox diver
Apr 9 2024, 9:53

Continue reading...
 
Sutton nails this.

I am still fuming at the decisions during that match. In my very biased opinion, I thought VAR got our penalty and the disallowed goal correct, but question why Beaton missed the very clear and obvious fouls by sevco players. Their penalty was a sick joke. It really was pathetic. The same experts that spent all week lecturing us that a defender going through the back of Kyogo with not a hope of touching the ball is acceptable, are now insisting that Silva's dive after AJ's perfectly timed tackle was indeed a penalty.

But it was all the little decisions that Beaton made with regards fouls against us and free kicks to sevco that got on my nerves. How Sterling avoided a booking, for example, is incomprehensible. The only benefit of the doubt we got was when CCV stupidly kicked the ball away after conceding yet another soft foul - that was a booking offence - but there were numerous occasions when sevco players got the same benefit (but often because Beaton did not even award a foul against them!!!).

We got exactly what we all knew we'd get from Beaton & Walsh, which the club quietly accepted beforehand. If you behave like a weak subservient then don't be surprised when you get treated like one.
 
Chris Sutton has told Graeme Souness that he’s not god and in doing so provided a much more viable summary of the incident we watched on Sky Sports on Sunday afternoon in the Glasgow Derby. And a word on the former referee that they use on Sky Sports who never seems to come down on Celtic’s side in any incident but always seems to favour the bizarre decisions that go the way of theRangers.

436258039_431039125960813_1120684359195542293_n-1-630x829.jpg


Maybe Sky Sports should look at using an impartial former referee from south of the border rather than one with links to the six counties and a particular club?

One that actually explains the rules of the game. He thought that it was a penalty to theRangers and also that Walsh was wrong to call Beaton back for the foul on Tomoki Iwata which ruled out the Dessers goal. Yet the only difference with the two challenges was Alistair Johnston got the ball! Dermot’s for the watching folks.

“I’m surprised someone who knows the game so well can’t see through a diver… we should be calling it out. Beaton was in a great position and initially books Silva. Walsh re-referees it and thinks it’s clear and obvious… did Walsh see the touch on the ball from Johnston? …mmm,” Chris Sutton posted on social media.

This was just part of his response to Graeme Souness who yesterday attacked Sutton for trying to influence VAR decision-making during the Glasgow Derby at Ibrox after John Beaton had booked Fabio Silva for diving.

rangers-fc-v-celtic-fc-cinch-scottish-premiership-168-630x378.jpg

GLASGOW, SCOTLAND – APRIL 07: Referee John Beaton . (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images) (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)


In his wider retort in an interview with Daily Record, Sutton defends his position magnificently.

“I have a lot of respect for Graeme as a player, manager and pundit. But he is talking utter nonsense to suggest I was trying to somehow influence VAR. It would have been better if Nick Walsh WAS watching Sky Sports – as the officials might have made the right call rather than rewarding cheating.

“I don’t know what he was watching when he called Beaton to the monitor, but it certainly wasn’t the TV coverage. Even in the unlikely event if they were, I’m not sure what kind of power Graeme thinks I wield. Does he think I’m God?! I don’t have that kind of sway unfortunately – give me another few months!

“In seriousness, it wasn’t a Celtic thing or a Rangers thing, I just called that incident as I saw it. If anything I suspect Graeme has the Rangers blinkers on as there is no way he’d think that was a penalty if any other team was involved. And having watched it over and over again, NOTHING has changed my mind about the incident. It is still not a penalty kick.

“Johnston clearly gets a touch on the ball and redirects its path. Silva sees the leg out and takes his chance to throw himself into it. Silva initiated the slight contact and are we supposed to reward simulation or stamp it out?




“He was rolling around all afternoon and this was another example. His behaviour was embarrassing. Beaton was close to the scene and his initial interpretation was spot on.

“He could see it in real time and he was right to show him a yellow card for yet another dive. I just can’t understand why Walsh got involved. The fact people can even debate it means it wasn’t a clear and obvious error from the referee in the first place.”




Yesterday Celtic contacted the Scottish FA with concerns over the footage Nick Walsh chose to show John Beaton as the video above points out. There is only a few seconds more in the more accurate footage that shows what actually happened. Beaton it appears did not revisit the incident properly in that VAR review as he did NOT see Alistair Johnston’s touch on the ball.

Meanwhile Celtic supporters must decide how to approach the Scottish Cup semi-final played at the Scottish FA’s ground at Hampden and any appropriate protest after the penalty incidents at Tynecastle, Livingston and now Ibrox.





Help raise funds for Celtic Youth Academy by playing the Celtic Pools Weekly Lottery and you could win up to £25,000. The lottery is £1 per week and if you join today you will receive a Premium Boxed Celtic Pen & Pencil Set.

More Stories / Latest News
Compare and contrast – no penalty to Celtic and a penalty awarded to Rangers
Apr 9 2024, 10:08
Visit Celticshorts.com – for short, sharp, Celtic news and commentary – available now
Apr 9 2024, 9:54
Chris Sutton delivers brilliant response to Souness on Ibrox diver
Apr 9 2024, 9:53

Continue reading...
A did think the same about that weasel dermot Gallagher a fucking nonentity..
 
Sutton nails this.

I am still fuming at the decisions during that match. In my very biased opinion, I thought VAR got our penalty and the disallowed goal correct, but question why Beaton missed the very clear and obvious fouls by sevco players. Their penalty was a sick joke. It really was pathetic. The same experts that spent all week lecturing us that a defender going through the back of Kyogo with not a hope of touching the ball is acceptable, are now insisting that Silva's dive after AJ's perfectly timed tackle was indeed a penalty.

But it was all the little decisions that Beaton made with regards fouls against us and free kicks to sevco that got on my nerves. How Sterling avoided a booking, for example, is incomprehensible. The only benefit of the doubt we got was when CCV stupidly kicked the ball away after conceding yet another soft foul - that was a booking offence - but there were numerous occasions when sevco players got the same benefit (but often because Beaton did not even award a foul against them!!!).

We got exactly what we all knew we'd get from Beaton & Walsh, which the club quietly accepted beforehand. If you behave like a weak subservient then don't be surprised when you get treated like one.
My stomach still churning when a see clips of that diving cunt,but I’m getting more angry way our performance bb,😡chances we spurned when a calm head was all that was required to score more goals that negates the var and referees for the rest of the match,maeda one on one way butthole😡Kyogo that wee extra touch😡substitutes argh!!!..why in fuck we needed three front guys on when we went 3-2 is bamboozling way 90 on the clock……this isn’t the first time this season Brendan’s dillydallyed way minutes to go in games we were 1-0 or 0-0 under severe pressure only to concede at the death??this is the reason these cunts are giving us a battle for £60 million!!!!he’s got six games to learn from this malaise…am in charge of that game I’m finishing way ccv,nawrocki,scales, Taylor,Johnson,iwata,mcgregor,Bernardo,forest,Idah,….break that down ya orange bastards 😡
 
Sutton nails this.

I am still fuming at the decisions during that match. In my very biased opinion, I thought VAR got our penalty and the disallowed goal correct, but question why Beaton missed the very clear and obvious fouls by sevco players. Their penalty was a sick joke. It really was pathetic. The same experts that spent all week lecturing us that a defender going through the back of Kyogo with not a hope of touching the ball is acceptable, are now insisting that Silva's dive after AJ's perfectly timed tackle was indeed a penalty.

But it was all the little decisions that Beaton made with regards fouls against us and free kicks to sevco that got on my nerves. How Sterling avoided a booking, for example, is incomprehensible. The only benefit of the doubt we got was when CCV stupidly kicked the ball away after conceding yet another soft foul - that was a booking offence - but there were numerous occasions when sevco players got the same benefit (but often because Beaton did not even award a foul against them!!!).

We got exactly what we all knew we'd get from Beaton & Walsh, which the club quietly accepted beforehand. If you behave like a weak subservient then don't be surprised when you get treated like one.
Also want to know why aj got booked for challenge on the fairy??beaton never seen it🤷‍♂️
 
Also want to know why aj got booked for challenge on the fairy??beaton never seen it🤷‍♂️
Watched a clip of clemont going mental when aj pushed silva to the extent collum the gormless wee shitebag could hardly hold him back!!and you can clearly see the Belgium bun telling the gormless cunt that it’s a booking??which Beaton duly obliged??am beginning to gather a pure hatred of this Belgium poppy eyed wank,he’s certainly no the gentleman the media up here try to portray….
 
Sutton at his best, Souness is another one who bumps his gums without any worthwhile contribution.

Souness is of the Craft, and like the rest of them is on message.

He is also on the list of accepting a substantial EBT payment from the former Rangers whilst being in the employ of an English Club as their manager for services apparently unknown, although there were strong rumours circulating about these alleged dealings, which I couldn’t possibly comment on.

All in all, not really a credible source is our Mr Souness, is he?…
 
Souness is of the Craft, and like the rest of them is on message.

He is also on the list of accepting a substantial EBT payment from the former Rangers whilst being in the employ of an English Club as their manager for services apparently unknown, although there were strong rumours circulating about these alleged dealings, which I couldn’t possibly comment on.

All in all, not really a credible source is our Mr Souness, is he?…
Apparently he received the payments 10 years later for some work he did for them. 🤔
 
Souness is of the Craft, and like the rest of them is on message.

He is also on the list of accepting a substantial EBT payment from the former Rangers whilst being in the employ of an English Club as their manager for services apparently unknown, although there were strong rumours circulating about these alleged dealings, which I couldn’t possibly comment on.

All in all, not really a credible source is our Mr Souness, is he?…
Dinny forget the Boumsong scenario. Fraudulant transfer dealings....
 
Also want to know why aj got booked for challenge on the fairy??beaton never seen it🤷‍♂️
Watched a clip of clemont going mental when aj pushed silva to the extent collum the gormless wee shitebag could hardly hold him back!!and you can clearly see the Belgium bun telling the gormless cunt that it’s a booking??which Beaton duly obliged??am beginning to gather a pure hatred of this Belgium poppy eyed wank,he’s certainly no the gentleman the media up here try to portray….
Yip. I've posted that same question a couple of times already - including immediately after the non-incident - so I didn't want post this query again. Beaton never saw it, but Gollum could be seen yapping in his mouthpiece to Beaton after restraining Clement while he was still screaming in his lug - Beaton then decided to book AJ. So was it the Deady Bear's manager or the swarm of their players hectoring Beaton as Portuguese actress rolled about smearing her own mascara due to the pain that resulted in the yellow card?
 
Not looked into this but there must be a case for the SFA to lose its position on IFAB.
If the can't implement or seemingly won't implement the rules of the game in their own country how can they set laws for other leagues.
No chance. The IFAB is a closed shop. The 4 home nations plus 4 other nations. I think they need a majority vote to change the set up but the UK countries have a pact to never vote this way. These guys have decades of looking after each other to stay on the gravy train.
 
Souness is a Grade A BAWBAG, I've still not forgotten his exclusive with the Scum about Scotland wasting our time at Mexico 86, pity the prick couldn't have told us before shelling out a few grand tae go & support our Country.

Then after his heart attack selling his, near death experience tae the Scum again. After what the rag of a paper done to the people of Liverpool.

Nowt but a opinionated Griffting dob.
 
Souness is a Grade A BAWBAG, I've still not forgotten his exclusive with the Scum about Scotland wasting our time at Mexico 86, pity the prick couldn't have told us before shelling out a few grand tae go & support our Country.

Then after his heart attack selling his, near death experience tae the Scum again. After what the rag of a paper done to the people of Liverpool.

Nowt but a opinionated Griffting dob.
The arsehole said he wished he had played for Eng-ger-lund rather than Scotland, as he would have earned more money during his already highly paid playing career. What a disgraceful disrepectful thing to say about representing your country.

Thankfully he was subsidised by illlegallly made, undeclared tax-free EBT payments from his former klub while he was actually managing another club, shortly before his current employers are persuaded to grossly overspend well above market value on a player from Ibrokes, which convientlly helped the desperate cashflow crisis at the EBT paying klub. That signficant tax-free bonus for "consultancy services" will have allowed Souness' family to eat that month.
 

Members online

Back
Top