I thought I recalled the crime of the century a little differently to the intolerance extremists.
The eejit comes on looking to only kick the ball, aimed at the ball and beat Tavernier and is going past
likely to celebrate as a hundred plus similar clothed and naked ball kickers have done before him all around the world but Tavernier likely felt embarrassed having the ball kicked away from him, and he Tavernier commits the first petty shoving, neither lays a real hurtful finger on the other in a comparative
to the bottle thrower non event.
His appeal should show what he is actually looking at, his intentions immediately after he has kicked the ball,
as he is clearly looking at the ball and away from the sevco player.
Anyone with intentions to actually harm would not be doing so would they.
Freeze from before he kicked the ball - he is looking at the ball, then freeze where you want until the sevco player decides to take him on and push him for kicking a ball.
100 days jail is a stupid pathetic judgment of events, and in context of many others far worse in plain sight on pitch actual assaults
such as the equally pathetic wee runt sevco zombie halliday's recent and clear purposeful assault on 2 if not 3 players after match-time play had ended- irrational reasoning and nothing like blind equality of justice and sentence.
Fall guy for the hibs bottle thrower at Sincy the week before.
Once he has won his appeal for common sense, he can then sue for loss of intended youtube adsense earnings.
Classic better than watching some matches.