I for one am not convinced Lenny is a good idea as long term manager. Why did he and Celtic part company a few years back? Because he was so good? That said, Comper played for the reserves today. Scored 2 and provided an assist in a 3-2 win. Never got a look in with BR.
Thoughts?
I think they parted for a couple of reasons.
1. The extreme hatred of Lennon and the demise of Rangers into Sevco meant he would be targeted even more and more. And he was getting it from all quarters including MSM. Seemed at time was only matter of time before the threats escalated into even more and more problems.
2. Club maybe thought they could get better value for money at time. Wanted to reduce the wage bills, so cheaper manager who had record of over acheiving with no real money. The revenues were certain o dive for Celtic with Rangers dead. Good for other clubs but bad financially for Celtic with lower crowds.
3. A change is sometimes a good way to divert media attention away from a hate figure.
Now nujber 1 is reason why i thought he wouldnt have come back especially with the hatred still there at Hibs although diminished from peak hate.
I think he is more mature manager with more experience and more hunger than previously.
I think he is better value for money than board thought last time having experienced two different types of coaches. The low price over achiever Big ronnie. The highly expensive top grade coach who wastes lots of value and demand massive wages to compete.
I think Lennon is better value than Rodgers and better option than Ronnie having had the experience of hindsight.
I actually loved big Ronnie but he couldnt cope with pressures or motivate to win aginst weaker teams.
I ended up hating rodgrs for his glib superfical shysterness and he actually proved my suspicions by running 9ff in night pretedning he loved Leicester to death.
Lennon is man for me.