SPFL Investigation

1 huns had communication they attempted to write their own resolution.
2 They stated they would announce results at five o clock they never knew Dundees vote was incomplete just took it as an abstain until Dundee contacted them
3.They never disregarded Dundees vote, they never had it, it went to spam which is not addressed as in line with requirements, and even if they did the resoloution was not carried based on it, until 28 days collapses, again the huns are not getting the rules in business law that a no can changeto a yes within 28 days, but 28 days was specified as part of the process. thats the legal mandate
4, The SPFL communicated contantly Aberdeen chairman confirmed he was in contact with ND all through the vote as was others
5 Again they had Stewart Robertson who was on the SPFL Advantage
6 They did comply they gave them 28 days and complied with comapny law
7. The huns are skint
For a club that is allegedly illiquid, and potentially unable to make payroll without external finance even with football being played to season end this season, to be asking for transparency from others without providing their own club members with trustworthy annual accounts and major litigation on multiple fronts, is strange situation.

its almost like it would suit them better to be banned from game rather than be truthful and honest with their own support.

they have a secret agreement with the very people they claim are not being transparent.

Why no spill the beans on the transparency of the secret agreement? Maybe thats the dossier they have.

everybody that signed that thing in secret could well be the people they are trying to manipulate again
 
For a club that is allegedly illiquid, and potentially unable to make payroll without external finance even with football being played to season end this season, to be asking for transparency from others without providing their own club members with trustworthy annual accounts and major litigation on multiple fronts, is strange situation.

its almost like it would suit them better to be banned from game rather than be truthful and honest with their own support.

they have a secret agreement with the very people they claim are not being transparent.

Why no spill the beans on the transparency of the secret agreement? Maybe thats the dossier they have.

everybody that signed that thing in secret could well be the people they are trying to manipulate again
you could be onto something there TET cause when Res12 was doing the rounds King threatned them with the 5 way and from then on evrything favoured sevco
 
For a club that is allegedly illiquid, and potentially unable to make payroll without external finance even with football being played to season end this season, to be asking for transparency from others without providing their own club members with trustworthy annual accounts and major litigation on multiple fronts, is strange situation.

its almost like it would suit them better to be banned from game rather than be truthful and honest with their own support.

they have a secret agreement with the very people they claim are not being transparent.

Why no spill the beans on the transparency of the secret agreement? Maybe thats the dossier they have.

everybody that signed that thing in secret could well be the people they are trying to manipulate again
Like to see them setup the 42 club inquiry on zoom, fucksake they are still on SKYPE over at hun radio.
10/4 SPFL do ya copy this is big blue bear at ibrox do you copy

Untitled.jpg
 
For a club that is allegedly illiquid, and potentially unable to make payroll without external finance even with football being played to season end this season, to be asking for transparency from others without providing their own club members with trustworthy annual accounts and major litigation on multiple fronts, is strange situation.

its almost like it would suit them better to be banned from game rather than be truthful and honest with their own support.

they have a secret agreement with the very people they claim are not being transparent.

Why no spill the beans on the transparency of the secret agreement? Maybe thats the dossier they have.

everybody that signed that thing in secret could well be the people they are trying to manipulate again

Yeah, I think you make a very good point about their manipulation tactics.
 
Put the hun to bed when king came in his first port of call was to get rid of the auditors who were employed by RIFC to run their ship.

5th July 2015 Deloitte quit as Rangers auditors over 'threats' to staff

By Martin Williams

Rangers directors John Gilligan, Paul Murray and company secretary James Blair during a general meeting of shareholders last month


Rangers directors John Gilligan, Paul Murray and company secretary James Blair during a general meeting of shareholders last month






DELOITTE have quit as auditors of financially troubled Rangers after staff received threatening and intimidating messages over a two year period.
In a letter distributed to Rangers International Football Club plc shareholders, Deloitte say the messages came from "anonymous third party sources" during 2013 and 2014.
In a separate letter to shareholders James Blair, the RIFC company secretary said: "The board is disappointed that Deloitte has chosen to resign due to acts which occurred in 2013 and 2014 whilst RIFC was under different stewardship."
South African businessman Dave King and allies took control of the RIFC board from allies of Sports Direct tycoon Mike Ashley in a shareholders vote at an extraordinary general meeting on March 6.
The Deloitte letter dated June 19 states: "We have decided that we no longer wish to carry on as auditor to the company.
"During the period of our audit appointment in 2013 and 2014, members of our engagement team and other Deloitte partners unconnected with the audit received threatening or intimidating messages from anonymous third party sources.

"The safety and wellbeing of our staff is of paramount importance, and they should not be subject to this treatment when undertaking their normal professional duties. Accordingly we are resigning as auditors to Rangers International Football Club plc."
Blair told shareholders there had been "positive discussions" ongoing with "alternative auditors" and that an announcement on an appointment will be made "in the near future".
The announcement to shareholders comes three months after the latest half-yearly RIFC accounts said that the Rangers holding company had appointed London-based accountants Jeffreys Henry to act as independent reporting accountants after discovering Deloitte had announced an "intention to resign" following the June 2014 audit.
Acting chairman Paul Murray said at the time that the previous board "chose not to announce this nor did they find a replacement".
At the time the board said it would make "a further announcement on this subject once we have found a replacement firm for Deloitte".
The board said the financial statement made for the six month period to December 31 2014 was made on a "going concern basis", saying it was investigating a "number of options" for future finance and had identified a number of potential investors.
Then, Jeffreys Henry said there remains "the existence of a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern".
The board also said it was continuing to investigate options regarding replacing the nominated adviser, which acts as a stock market regulator.
It came after Manchester-based WH Ireland quit as the club's stock market nominated adviser (Nomad). That led to shares in the holding company Rangers International Football Club plc being suspended from trading on the Aim stock market on March 4.
RIFC are still trying to find an alternative trading platform for shareholders. Deloitte were unavailable for further comment.
 
Huns getting the Dutch battle fever on and thinking a great decision, tell that to the team who are not getting promoted.The Dutch if they felt they could not split their top two as both on the same points and relegation to close to call, then it has to be two additions to their top league but thats the Dutch decision and the Dutch have fuck all to do with us.
 
The huns provided no evidence or content so their complaint was nothing but a muttering of fish wife gossip, the audit looked at the paper trail and published the trail, submitt the evidence that you claim to have and also before submitting make it clear WTF you are on about and wanting investigated or jog on and stop pestering people.
 
RANGERS INTERNATIONAL FOOTBALL CLUB PLC The company

Company number SC437060

Registered office address

Ibrox Stadium, 150 Edmiston Drive, Glasgow, G51 2XD

Company status

Active

Company type

Public limited Company





THE RANGERS FOOTBALL CLUB LIMITED The club

Company number SC425159

Registered office address

Ibrox Stadium, 150 Edmiston Drive, Glasgow, G51 2XD

Company status

Active

Company type

Private limited Company

Incorporated on

29 May 2012

Previous company names​
Name
Period
SEVCO SCOTLAND LIMITED29 May 2012 - 31 Jul 2012


Just as well the original rangers club died or that would be an investigation, or would the SPFL go there.
So who is it that is making a fuss this time round and throwing toys out the pram, is it the tribute act. Deloitt worked for them, talk about falling out with people.
What happened to we want an apology from that SPFL guy for saying he hated the old Rangers.
What happened to all the clubs have our back
What happened to the media story and the backing now they are running for cover again in case real questions like you want our support against the SPFL lets talk Res 12 and 5 way agreement.
Tom English has the platform to ask these questions now if he wants to go on air tommorow and talk about independent enquiries and 42 club backing, lets go the full road whilst the footballs off and we have plenty of time to talk corruption.
lets see what Gordon Smith and Campbell have to say in the media about unregistered players and EBTs
Lets see what wee Dickson has to say for himself
 
Back
Top