Delloitte are following Peter Lawwells orders,just like all the clubs who voted yes,the SPFL/SFA/EUFA/FIFA,in fact anyone who is not a hun!!!!apparently deloite are more corrupt that Dave King..... genuine patter fae them...lets just leave that there
Another inquiry and clubs meanwhile go to the wall.Delloitte are following Peter Lawwells orders,just like all the clubs who voted yes,the SPFL/SFA/EUFA/FIFA,in fact anyone who is not a hun!!!!
Hun's doing a Nero,watch football die to prevent Celtic getting 9 in a row,they reek of hypocrisy and desperation!Another inquiry and clubs meanwhile go to the wall.
9s in the bag MD there is no null and void on the table thats why there was a vote to attempt salvage the like of hearts etc and get United up for an Aberdeen derby. Celtic are streets ahead MD.Hun's doing a Nero,watch football die to prevent Celtic getting 9 in a row,they reek of hypocrisy and desperation!
For a club that is allegedly illiquid, and potentially unable to make payroll without external finance even with football being played to season end this season, to be asking for transparency from others without providing their own club members with trustworthy annual accounts and major litigation on multiple fronts, is strange situation.1 huns had communication they attempted to write their own resolution.
2 They stated they would announce results at five o clock they never knew Dundees vote was incomplete just took it as an abstain until Dundee contacted them
3.They never disregarded Dundees vote, they never had it, it went to spam which is not addressed as in line with requirements, and even if they did the resoloution was not carried based on it, until 28 days collapses, again the huns are not getting the rules in business law that a no can changeto a yes within 28 days, but 28 days was specified as part of the process. thats the legal mandate
4, The SPFL communicated contantly Aberdeen chairman confirmed he was in contact with ND all through the vote as was others
5 Again they had Stewart Robertson who was on the SPFL Advantage
6 They did comply they gave them 28 days and complied with comapny law
7. The huns are skint
you could be onto something there TET cause when Res12 was doing the rounds King threatned them with the 5 way and from then on evrything favoured sevcoFor a club that is allegedly illiquid, and potentially unable to make payroll without external finance even with football being played to season end this season, to be asking for transparency from others without providing their own club members with trustworthy annual accounts and major litigation on multiple fronts, is strange situation.
its almost like it would suit them better to be banned from game rather than be truthful and honest with their own support.
they have a secret agreement with the very people they claim are not being transparent.
Why no spill the beans on the transparency of the secret agreement? Maybe thats the dossier they have.
everybody that signed that thing in secret could well be the people they are trying to manipulate again
Like to see them setup the 42 club inquiry on zoom, fucksake they are still on SKYPE over at hun radio.For a club that is allegedly illiquid, and potentially unable to make payroll without external finance even with football being played to season end this season, to be asking for transparency from others without providing their own club members with trustworthy annual accounts and major litigation on multiple fronts, is strange situation.
its almost like it would suit them better to be banned from game rather than be truthful and honest with their own support.
they have a secret agreement with the very people they claim are not being transparent.
Why no spill the beans on the transparency of the secret agreement? Maybe thats the dossier they have.
everybody that signed that thing in secret could well be the people they are trying to manipulate again
For a club that is allegedly illiquid, and potentially unable to make payroll without external finance even with football being played to season end this season, to be asking for transparency from others without providing their own club members with trustworthy annual accounts and major litigation on multiple fronts, is strange situation.
its almost like it would suit them better to be banned from game rather than be truthful and honest with their own support.
they have a secret agreement with the very people they claim are not being transparent.
Why no spill the beans on the transparency of the secret agreement? Maybe thats the dossier they have.
everybody that signed that thing in secret could well be the people they are trying to manipulate again
Previous company names | |
Name | Period |
SEVCO SCOTLAND LIMITED | 29 May 2012 - 31 Jul 2012 |
They are not going there MD!!They know that we know,what they know,let's get all the skeletons out of the closet and have a real investigation!