Steviebhoy67
Well-known member
They finally admit they're a new club
The Sevco penalty clause….
- Thread starter bhoy4life
- Start date
bhoy4life
Well-known member
Am on record as saying we haven’t seen the worst of Walsh yet.
he will put Beaton and Madden in the shade as he has already proved he cares not a jot how obvious his allegiance is.
Magnificent 7
Well-known member
What odds would you get for a penalty to Rangers 4/6?
What odds would you get for a penalty against Rangers 16/1
Odds for a Rangers red card 10/1
Odds for a Celtic red card 5/7
Offside goal given for Rangers 2/5
Offside goal given for Celtic 66/1
Goal for Celtic ruled out for 'offside' 3/1
Scottish football is rigged to support Rangers. We need unbiased refs.
What odds would you get for a penalty against Rangers 16/1
Odds for a Rangers red card 10/1
Odds for a Celtic red card 5/7
Offside goal given for Rangers 2/5
Offside goal given for Celtic 66/1
Goal for Celtic ruled out for 'offside' 3/1
Scottish football is rigged to support Rangers. We need unbiased refs.
DIGGER1155
Well-known member
In any other job you’re Honest Mistakes would cost you,your job or you would be moved to somewhere where you could do the least damage,the mistakes made by so called refs would not be tolerated in any other profession that is the standard in the SFA and if it hurts Celtic so much the better
Magnificent 7
Well-known member
Barkas to be MOTM ?......
DIGGER1155
Well-known member
Have you noticed that
Trump
Putin
Sevco
are all singing from the same song book
not thier fault try the guy next door
Trump
Putin
Sevco
are all singing from the same song book
not thier fault try the guy next door
A different Penalty Clause, Phil Mac saying that if Sevco pull out of The Athenian Fenians homecoming tour down under- the financial penalties for pulling out now are larger than the fee the support act are getting for the Sydney Tournament.
There ain’t no Sanity Clause.
There ain’t no Sanity Clause.
Someone on the Noise said they tried to place a bet at the bookies for a penalty to Sevco. The bookie refused the bet. I can’t remember who it was though.
bhoy4life
Well-known member
Ive been betting penalties in Sevco games the last 3 seasons on a regular basis. 1st goal a pen usually around 10/1, Sevco to score a pen usually around 7/2 or 4/1.
These odds have tumbled over the last few seasons, you’d be lucky to get 6/1 1st goal a pen and Ive seen it as low as 6/4 a Sevco penalty to be scored.
Even Tavernier is amongst the lowest prices for goalscorer due to the amount of pens he takes.
Sometimes you dont even get the chance to bet on pens in Sevco games.
The bookies know the score.
There is no way that Sevco can withdraw from the Sydney game. The legal agreement is enforceable in Australia and the penalty for withdrawal is eye watering.
Big Bobo's bunnet
Well-known member
Wouldn't mind seeing the list of players committing the fouls. Can't be that significant as it would of had more of a spotlight on it.
There's been a % of soft, % of non and a % genuine pens. The huns will be well aware of the "benefit" of the doubt awards given. Any decent pro player will know how to make space for themselves in the box. If your a hun forward and it doesn't look like there are options open then it's simple. Don't look to gain a yard, employ the dark arts, draw a tackle/feel or look for contact and go down.
If we remove the hun tactics - do we give the refs the same choices to make as often?
There have been plenty of "if that was the huns that would of been given" scenarios.
That aside do we draw enough fouls in the box? Probably not. I've watched us pass around trying to create space.
The huns opt to just get it in the mix and draw fouls or go down as if they have been shot.
There's been a % of soft, % of non and a % genuine pens. The huns will be well aware of the "benefit" of the doubt awards given. Any decent pro player will know how to make space for themselves in the box. If your a hun forward and it doesn't look like there are options open then it's simple. Don't look to gain a yard, employ the dark arts, draw a tackle/feel or look for contact and go down.
If we remove the hun tactics - do we give the refs the same choices to make as often?
There have been plenty of "if that was the huns that would of been given" scenarios.
That aside do we draw enough fouls in the box? Probably not. I've watched us pass around trying to create space.
The huns opt to just get it in the mix and draw fouls or go down as if they have been shot.
Last edited:
