And they must think we are all bloody stupid, hhSo we are to believe that neither (Rangers)PR team/(Sky)production team lookedat this interview when it was done accuracy ,information that is true bothoutfits are total (Amateurs)or liars and I know what camp of thoughts I'm in .
I said similar on a different thread pat. If sky are saying that they aren't responsible for the subtitling then they owe it to Celtic and the Celtic family to come out and tell us who is responsible. An apology and re'broadcasting of the interview is all well and good etc but not good enough not by a long way. We deserve to know was it traynors pr team and sevco ? Was it an individual with a hatred of Celtic? Either way its unacceptable that sky simply apologises and that's that, no is this person or persons or organisation still working with sky? If so why? They are liars and a company such as sky has a moral obligation to be transparent and tell us the truth, after all it is the Celtic supporters who are wronged here and I for one am certainly not satisfied with just an unreserved apology, all and any Celtic supporters who have a sky contract should be within the laws of the land to terminate their contract for misrepresentation of us all.So we are to believe that neither (Rangers)PR team/(Sky)production team lookedat this interview when it was done accuracy ,information that is true bothoutfits are total (Amateurs)or liars and I know what camp of thoughts I'm in .
........................It doesn't matter who was responsible for the translating, Sky Broadcast it and in doing so defamed Celtic FC and the Celtic Support.
That’s it spot on hhIt doesn't matter who was responsible for the translating, Sky Broadcast it and in doing so defamed Celtic FC and the Celtic Support.
Sky are definitely guilty of that theres no 2ways about it WCB, that said , a calculated attack on our club and support has taken place and skys platform was the vehicle. I've no doubts at all that if I had personally or in collusion with others used sky in this manner I would probably find the police at my door with handcuffs, it's in our interests and should also be in skys to quickly get to the bottom of this and hold the perpetrator(s) to account. In the case of sky they must know where the material came from and from whom it came from. In their line of business a worldwide news and entertainment platform, they should be seen showing transparency even in the face of their own humiliation and reporting their findings, Ofcom must have regulations that they are in violation of unwittingly or not I'd have thought?It doesn't matter who was responsible for the translating, Sky Broadcast it and in doing so defamed Celtic FC and the Celtic Support.
Sky are definitely guilty of that theres no 2ways about it WCB, that said , a calculated attack on our club and support has taken place and skys platform was the vehicle. I've no doubts at all that if I had personally or in collusion with others used sky in this manner I would probably find the police at my door with handcuffs, it's in our interests and should also be in skys to quickly get to the bottom of this and hold the perpetrator(s) to account. In the case of sky they must know where the material came from and from whom it came from. In their line of business a worldwide news and entertainment platform, they should be seen showing transparency even in the face of their own humiliation and reporting their findings, Ofcom must have regulations that they are in violation of unwittingly or not I'd have thought?