The resistance to Res12 strongly suggests some folk have something to hide. The two main guys are Petrie and Dickson who sat on the 2011 Licensing Committee chaired by Petrie.
Petrie was the main go between on the 5 Way Agreement and it is inconceivable that Celtic were not one of his ports of call, which involves Lawwell.
These 3 between them would have questions to answer if a proper investigation were mounted into SFA handling of UEFA licence in 2011, hence the resistance.
Given the efforts to keep "Rangers" alive in any form after they went bust then if their dependency for survival on CL money was known before March 2011, granting a licence would have been a perfect reason to stop the carnage of 2012. Only Ally foiled a perfect solution by losing to Malmo and Maribor and no one could have anticipated the impact of that, so it is at least plausible that the grant was part of a set up by those involved in the 5 Way Agreement.
Being plausible does not mean it was so, but when the eventual charge, according to Rangers, omits the grant period at end of March 2011 from scrutiny for reasons unknown, and when Celtic refuse to act on usable evidence from March 2011 provided in May and August 2018 suggesting fraud in March 2011 and end the SFA Judicial Process surrendered by the JPDT to CAS, the plausible starts to look more than credible.
The one identifiable trait which is common among all of the major actors in this drama, is their utter unwillingness to provide any kind of transparency as to their roles, knowledge and intentions.
This type of case would be a federal matter in the USA. A recent example of this could be found in the FBI's study into CONCACAF and the subsequent repercussions that rocked FIFA. This led to wider criminal investigations into Michel Platini and the rigged Qatari World Cup bid.
It would take a similar deep dive to unravel this tangled knot and would it not be the case that because of American corporate sponsorship of UEFA's flagship club tournament, that there may be a door ajar for FBI involvement; particularly if American corporations are partially funding a rigged game?
The territorial policing will be an issue, but if American dollars are being hidden in offshore accounts outwith American borders and are subsequently subject to FBI involvement, then the same must apply to American dollars being used to subsidise a possible/probable/definite fraud?
A stumbling block is that deadco did not benefit financially from this plot; however - there still remains probable cause regarding UEFA's lack of oversight. There is also the fact that any attempt at criminal activity did not take place within US territories, but American citizens may have still been affected and impacted by a deliberately fraudulent attempt to procure money provided by the aforementioned US citizens.
Contact Mastercard and PepsiCo, they might not give two squirts, but nothing ventured, nothing gained.
Contact the Feds as well, but ask for Mulder and Scully because they'll be going deep into the x-rated files.