I think Nial has answered the point about looking back.
'Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it. '
and if you read the frame around which the Res12 Narrative originally presented on Phil's blog it is about closure on the past and looking to the future based on the actual experience of what works and what doesn't.
This is not a campaign against The Board. Res12 never was as is clear from the opening section where the subject raised with Lawwell was SFA Reform and if that happens then every Celtic supporter will benefit.
It was very disappointing to find out Celtic are part of the problem and not part of the solution and that should give many lots to think about.
Perhaps they would rather not because holding two conflicting ideas in mind at the same time is stressful. I went into this thinking Celtic were Lobby Dosser and the rest Rank Bad Yin and came out realising there was no Sherriff only Bad Yins..
That is very disconcerting to have to come to terms with so the narrative gets reframed into an issue that is less uncomfortable. See cognitive dissonance
https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-cognitive-dissonance-2795012
and for younger readers (
https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/lobey-dosser )