K
kelly
Guest
That was the rumour don't know if it was factAs an aside.....is it correct in saying Dermott Desmond bank rolled Robbie Keane’s time at Celtic from his own pocket to the tune of £65,000 a game?
That was the rumour don't know if it was factAs an aside.....is it correct in saying Dermott Desmond bank rolled Robbie Keane’s time at Celtic from his own pocket to the tune of £65,000 a game?
thats the same as every player at club?Desmond takes money out of the club for personal profit. He doesn't need to.
None of the players are billionaires, they are employees.thats the same as every player at club?
For a highly intelligent person you are missing the pointNone of the players are billionaires, they are employees.
Also the minute rich people gift you stuff then your not a club your a charity.
you don't think they contribute enough to receive those returns?Never suggested he 'gift' anything rather take less out. Look at Lawwell's obscene wages and consider how much Desmond is making annually.
paying money to uncover crimes with private investigators seems mental to meIn fairness I was blootered when I started this thread but the point was Desmond makes millions out of the club every year. He doesn't need it. I then suggested he should instead spend some of that money on investigating referees and officials to uncover corruption and anything else that would put manners on the fuckers and ensure a level playing field. Don't know how people have come up with the idea that I'm suggesting the club be given charity.
I did say I was blootered when I started the thread so it certainly came from an altered state of consciousness.paying money to uncover crimes with private investigators seems mental to me
besides if the system is bent then the uncovering will get nowhere, try convicting a knight or a prince
you don't think they contribute enough to receive those returns?
Or they dont need them so should gift them back to club?
that's demanding he do with his fair slice what you want him to do
if he did that then fine
but it would set a precedent that rich dudes must give to club not get returns for their acumen and what they bring
both lawed and DD bring much more than meets the eye
And despite taking what equity (fairness) returns you are demanding they give it back
give it back if they decide
but its not the way of fairness
DD and lawell talents could make more money than any player at our club
they put their talent to club use
So rather than have the old board style of family gets slice and club is their toy
we have open transparent self sustaining system that does not require gifts from billionaires to pay the bills
that system was how celtic won the big cup
it got hijacked by the family
we got Fergus to get shot of the family
But despite the Fergus way being unpopular at first
it pays the bills and makes you stronger while adding to society
the minute you cut out the talented money people who do it above board is the minute you get Murray Whyte Green and King scamming the club
A two day hangover PMM?TET do something about your formatting please. I'm still feeling ropey from the weekend and my psyche hurts just looking at that never mind trying to read it.
............................I did say I was blootered when I started the thread so it certainly came from an altered state of consciousness.
Wasn't there a thing a few decades ago where the woman assigning the referees was riding most of them? Imagine if that had been exposed at the time. Considering we're dealing with corrupt fuckers you can be sure there's plenty of dirt on all of them.
Exposure or the threat thereof is a wonderful weapon just look at Andrew Windsor; convicted in the court of public opinion and effectively decommissioned.