Is it time to ditch VAR altogether? BR says it is. Vote.

Ditch it?

  • Yes

    Votes: 23 63.9%

  • No

    Votes: 6 16.7%

  • Parts of it.

    Votes: 7 19.4%
  • Total voters
    36
Shottsghirl said:
100% correct E ! It’s not the first time either that one of our players are assaulted And it is assault
Do that in the street and you’re lifted No questions asked We are going to end up with another Johnny Thompson if this is not stopped Tackles are one thing but yesterdays attack on Kyogo was brutal assault So what are you going to do about it board ? Wait until it’s too late because that’s coming One of these attacks will be one too far
Click to expand...
My thoughts as well SG though its actually the stupid " play til the end of the phase then lift the offside flag " rule that I'm concerned with regarding injuries.
Linesman knows its offside but the rules say let it play out til end of phase, meanwhile on the field you have attackers and defenders going Hell for leather for nothing.
So in this scenario , a masterful team of the dark arts like Atleti, the defender knows its offside and likely will be called back for that, but he can scythe down the attacker and not be booked as it was offside in the first place. Have seen a few lucky players stay on the field because of this.
Yet Palma is booked for taking his shirt off for scoring when he was offside, something he wouldn't have done had he known.
There should be a time limit if not instantly a flag of 5-10 seconds so defenders and attackers are not involved in a 100% flat out battle that will end in an offside flag.
This rule is asking for trouble I'm amazed it hasn't cost anyone too much yet.
 
The Deadner said:
I think you need to read what I wrote again. I said fuck all about conspiracies or maeda getting sent off or dallas or the huns or anything like that. I was pointing out the different quality of the technology being used in the spfl and the technology in the champions league. I was referring to the fucking state of the lines drawn against maeda last week. Read it again.
Click to expand...
Re read, point taken.
 
Winter said:
My thoughts as well SG though its actually the stupid " play til the end of the phase then lift the offside flag " rule that I'm concerned with regarding injuries.
Linesman knows its offside but the rules say let it play out til end of phase, meanwhile on the field you have attackers and defenders going Hell for leather for nothing.
So in this scenario , a masterful team of the dark arts like Atleti, the defender knows its offside and likely will be called back for that, but he can scythe down the attacker and not be booked as it was offside in the first place. Have seen a few lucky players stay on the field because of this.
Yet Palma is booked for taking his shirt off for scoring when he was offside, something he wouldn't have done had he known.
There should be a time limit if not instantly a flag of 5-10 seconds so defenders and attackers are not involved in a 100% flat out battle that will end in an offside flag.
This rule is asking for trouble I'm amazed it hasn't cost anyone too much yet.
Click to expand...
That’s far too sensible It’ll never catch on - not with those stupid bigoted idiots in charge of it like we have now
 
Shottsghirl said:
That’s far too sensible It’ll never catch on - not with those stupid bigoted idiots in charge of it like we have now
Click to expand...
That's it SG, that is exactly it.
There's nothing wrong with the tech we see it in rugby and tennis , different games obviously but both require bang on judgements.
So if it works in those sports it should work in ours, is trying to sort out what just happened there in a scrum more difficult than figuring out what happened between 2 attackers and 3 defenders? I doubt that very much.
So it has to be , simply has to be down to those at the controls.
Those Video assistants who've somehow become the actual referee for any of the bigger decisions, referee on the the field is now the de facto assistant as its easier to just say " but var clearly showed" in hindsight etc, rather than stand up as a referee and say no I'm happy with my original ruling and it stands, how would that go down I wonder in the corridors at Mount florida?
They'll use sectarianism and other bs as reason why not to have all mic"d up so all can hear, oh that ref has had death threats etc.

This is a power struggle, that hopefully as TTQ was trying to point out will be the undoing of them all, here in Scotland which has a different landscape than other nations, due to sectarianism etc.
There's obviously the powers that be in suits and the same for the refs.
I hope he's right , all will be exposed eventually and hopefully in my lifetime though the SFA probably have records sealed longer than thr royals.

A referee, at the game is , say muir who's now breaking into the top tier ( no laughing at the back please) at the young age of 48.

If he's referee at Celtic v *Rangers ( unlikely as they'll pick one of their usual suspects) and there's a penalty being checked by var officials , Dallas, and Beaton , lets say Muir has already given the penalty in real time but in his ear is invited to look at it again on the monitor.
Is it fair to say a relative newcomer will change his mind because he's been asked to look at something he missed or stand by his ruling and dismiss the two " more experienced, more cleeked assistants?"
I'd say that he'd likely change his ruling not necessarily out of hate/dislike for Celtic or the opposite for *rangers but for his job credibility.

Chances are in his debrief " why did you not listen to Mr Dallas and Beaton?" > " because in my judgement as the referee , not the assistant I upheld my original decision having looked at the monitor and came to the conclusion I was right the first time, penalty to Celtic ".
That's not going to go down well, I suspect. A " whit? You're telling us? You know who we are? " type situation.

I suspect this is going on all over the globe, but we don't see enough, 2 assistant referees and a video expert in the room.
The two assistants cannot debate all day so one must shirley be senior to the other.
Methinks
 
Last edited:
Brimcbhoy said:
Must admit I'm surprised how few people have voted on this one. I know there's a hard-core of regulars who have, but it's had a lot of views.
Click to expand...
Should've let me do it 😅
26 is not bad in the 30s is a good return,huge majority are readers and not contributers.
 
Vigobhoy said:
Why Irish... It is a Scottish club. No disrespect to Irish fans but the focus should be Scottish IMO.
Click to expand...
Celtic was founded on an Irish identity, Oppressed , denied an identity. That's actually a fundamental ideal in life, an identity? One that's accepted and not deprived of basic ideals? We play a scottish game of football, but the focus is never on the where we play or who we play It's on how those who deprive us of the ideal of fairness?
 
Football is helped in theory by Video Assisted Referees, but theory conflicts with reality. In Scotland VAR has never shown to be neutral. Our officials have no obligation to reveal their biases which is appalling. VAR should assist Celtic because we are the best team and compete against the refs. Sadly VAR is used as a way to deny goals to Celtic
 
Commo Estas 64 said:
Celtic was founded on an Irish identity, Oppressed , denied an identity. That's actually a fundamental ideal in life, an identity? One that's accepted and not deprived of basic ideals? We play a scottish game of football, but the focus is never on the where we play or who we play It's on how those who deprive us of the ideal of fairness?
Click to expand...
Whilst I appreciate your comments CE, I have never been one for mytholgy
 
Vigobhoy said:
Whilst I appreciate your comments CE, I have never been one for mytholgy
Click to expand...
Thanks Vigo, I love mythology. Even Santa and the forthcoming xmas could be based on those, sure you won't celebrate either? If there was not a large influence of Irish in Scotland, Celtic FC would not exist.? If the foundations you build something on are shifting sands, they fail? Our sands are fixed, our ideals, non-negotiable. Equality for all. es facil, siempre amigo, cuidate :)
 
It should only be used with dedicated, properly trained, independent, non Scottish officials and administrators, who must declare their own, and any immediate family connections or allegiances, to Scottish football clubs or associations, either past or present. Then there might be a decent chance of it being successful.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 133 (members: 4, guests: 129)

Latest posts

Share this page

Back
Top