Theverdict1
Well-known member
Pundit Alan McInally said he knew he was going or had held talks to go Leicester long before the january window long before
Darren fletcher confirmed that everyone knew he was going to Leicester
others have said the same
Demble called him out and was made to look like he was the one in the wrong
Boyata has yet to tell his tale but i would guess it would be somewhere along the lines of what Demble had said
His signing targets were laughable and i have no love for the board ,but it was snakemans decision to go buy
Hendry
commperr
Not the boards choice , he mocked players that the board brought in and as for Bayo he left that guy on his arse and by rumours coming out of lennoxtown he's not very good yet Koulo assured us he had everything
Footballs a small world ,when news got out about china the club would have known well in advance he was working behind there back , so backing him in the transfer market in August would have been a waste
Even come january he already new he wouldn't be here so again would it be wise to buy players on the strength of it
we got loan players and Bayo and some kid in UKraine who he moked yet he's banging in the goals for fun and looks a player
we were used he came aboard with new ideas we backed him £3m wasted on a pitch ffs
we were only a shop window to help him get his ego back into the EPL ,he's a cheque book manager who will sign a lot more duds as his ego takes over.
And a dud in europe
He came
He went
fk him
If all of these claims are true, don’t you think Lawell and the board made a disastrous call to let him continue? Remember if we will, that when he went to talk to Leicester, Lawell was saying he didn’t know what was going to happen. Why would he do that if he knew all the stuff being claimed?
Why wouldn’t he get rid? He certainly should have if that stuff is true, again showing for me at least an abdication of his responsibility as CEO.
Also, I would be interested to see the comments you quoted and what the date of them was. If they emerged after he left, then that to me is not evidence, it’s hindsight, it’s hearsay.
Anycunt can come out after the fact and add up the ducks, create a backstory. If they have had these views published or aired before he left then it gives them credence. If it was after, my question to them would be, what fucking kept you?
Everybody and their aunty can say anything after the event and get it to fit what the narrative could be. It’s the reason I have problems with any conspiracy theory. It’s always after events take place and the truth can be even created to fit your point of view.
So where these comments published about his intentions to go before he went? We read he had an offer from China. But, why the fuck would a young manager who fancied himself go there? Now?
And even if it all turned out to be true, what the fuck were the board thinking? To know all that stuff and let him take the cunt is atrocious leadership. So he was a cunt and the board were weak cunts letting him away with it. Neither way is good enough.