Espiritosanto
Well-known member
Where did they dig him up from?
If that’s no a penalty a give inWhere did they dig him up from?
Where did they dig him up from?
If that’s no a penalty a give inWhere did they dig him up from?
Wow! Just wow, TET. I really don't know what to say to that comment. That is maybe acceptable in UFC but it would be a red card if you tried that at Murrayfield. If that isn't a penalty then the Scottish Football should be rebranded as Scottish Rollerball.i also dont think that was a penalty
For me the defender has stood his ground, no barge from defender, if anything gg barges into defender. had sevco got one for that id be calling it a dive.
no foul for me on that occasion
had it een given i wouldnt have complainedWow! Just wow, TET. I really don't know what to say to that comment. That is maybe acceptable in UFC but it would be a red card if you tried that at Murrayfield. If that isn't a penalty then the Scottish Football should be rebranded as Scottish Rollerball.
It is not about the defender holding his ground - he very clearly throws a flailing arm/elbow into GG's head. That is seriously dangerous play and is a penalty 10 times out of 10!had it een given i wouldnt have complained
i suspect that if i had an iron bar and smacked gg with it it would not have much effect
the defender has right to hold his ground
gg runs into him and falls like he been shot
i doubt had he been punch square in chops e would go down in pub
the bloke who missed the play on makes it worse imo
had that been ccv holding ground against striker of opps i would not have wanted that as penalty
i suspect ref would have given it as penalty if it had been ragers
but despite being more apenalty than most opf actuial penalties given at ibro this season
none of those weak claims were penalties imo
and that 1 against gg for me was defender trying to hold his ground with momentum against him and striker coming through him
i seen ragers get apenalty against aberdeen for less this season
but still imo neither are penalties
not for meIt is not about the defender holding his ground - he very clearly throws a flailing arm/elbow into GG's head. That is seriously dangerous play and is a penalty 10 times out of 10!
i see gg charging into the defender bouncing backwards and defender throwing arm back to keep balance feeling contactIt is not about the defender holding his ground - he very clearly throws a flailing arm/elbow into GG's head. That is seriously dangerous play and is a penalty 10 times out of 10!
I guess we will agree to disagree because I cannot match up with your description of the events with what I am seeing with my own eyes.i see gg charging into the defender bouncing backwards and defender throwing arm back to keep balance feeling contact
if that was morelosI guess we will agree to disagree because I cannot match up with your description of the events with what I am seeing with my own eyes.
aye the 75/25 bias in their favour is a 25 point swing in celtic favour, since it should be 100/0 bias forra masonic secrets ltdIt appears most of us have been wrong all along! The FIBs (not MIBs) have been cruelly cheating sevco as they favoured their beloved Sellick!
Ibrox Researcher reveals that Celtic have benefitted by 25 points this season due to honest mistakes!
Close research by an Ibrox Twitter account has revealed how Celtic have benefitted by 25 points due to honest mistakes this season.videocelts.com
The defender made absolutely no attempt to play the ball, just wanted to stop GG from getting to the ballIt is not about the defender holding his ground - he very clearly throws a flailing arm/elbow into GG's head. That is seriously dangerous play and is a penalty 10 times out of 10!
That's some force he used to keep his balance ,never seen anyone throw the arm up with force to ,,,keep their balancei see gg charging into the defender bouncing backwards and defender throwing arm back to keep balance feeling contact
What about poor old Ryan Jack who repeatedly has to very gently lay his foot onto his opponents' shins to avoid toppling over.That's some force he used to keep his balance ,never seen anyone throw the arm up with force to ,,,keep their balance
GG is a bulldozer and he was supposedly looking at the ball and coming through back of defenderThat's some force he used to keep his balance ,never seen anyone throw the arm up with force to ,,,keep their balance
Sorry Tet, but reading over your opinions upon the Jack off and GG incidents, I can only conclude that you never actually played the game that much, if at all.GG is a bulldozer and he was supposedly looking at the ball and coming through back of defender
but he bounced backwards and down
i dont believe you could knock that guy to ground if you tried
i suspect he would run right through you even if you tried to block him from static position with the momentum on his side
But he crumbled backwards as if he anticipatedcontact
ive seen penalties given for less especially for them
But to me that was not a penalty
1 shot still took place
2 gg was not in control of the ball
3 gg went down like a sack like he was shot but he had no marks on his face or needed treatment that i can remember
4 im all for fiing the ref problems
But i dont think that is a penalty had the dude at back post buried it it was mute
I think gg on that occasion tried to con ref, just my opinion
i see other players atother teams get penalties and freekick they bought by conning ref
on original play and even having watched it several times
the mechanics and personael involved in that collition make me think it was morelosesque faint
morelos is a mule
you cant get him on ground very easily but he spends half hisd life falling over
on tat occassion i think gg didnt think he could make the ball so tried a best man fall competition
had penalty been given i wouldnt have complained
But for me its too dubious a call to be clear cut ref cheating
i wouldnt have given penalty fo0r that despite my inherrent unconscious bias
for me its not a penalty
jack off tackle?Sorry Tet, but reading over your opinions upon the Jack off and GG incidents, I can only conclude that you never actually played the game that much, if at all.
The Jack off tackle, back in the day, was known as a "cowards tackle" as you never had any intention of playing the ball whatsoever, when your foot is that high and you know you are only looking to injure the player in a manner that was unacceptable.
You had crossed the line and made a target for yourself and had to accept the consequences as your own team mates would mind your back.
But times are meant to have changed, but not so within Scottish football still, when rules will only be applied according to the situation still.
Conclusion
As the leg breaker occurred in the 97 minute and never actually affected the outcome of the game, then it was deemed as OK, so no intention of wanting to clean the Scottish game still.
As for the GG incident, nowadays when a foul is committed within the area, players would be instructed to highlight it, in an attempt to gain the right decision.
Make of it, weather its right or not? but that's the way it is today.
The defender had no intention of actually trying to play the ball, only GG. It was a very clear foul and as it was in the area, then the only decision was a penalty, so size has no place within your opinion.
If you are fouled, your fouled and players these days highlight even more so, that it borders on cheating and kunt is becoming a master at it also, along with many others also nowadays.
Conclusion
Cause meada missed the header, I believe he should have scored from, the 1st offence gets overlooked still.
Does it suit the agenda still in play? Of course it does.
Yet I will leave you with this Tet? The pen awarded against us at the ewe camp, was hand ball, twice in fact, yet the foul beforehand was overlooked as usual.
So mibs will only act upon what they want to see but still haven't the ability to apply the modern day rules, and so called honest mistakes has nothing to do with matters either imo.
I think we all understand that individual frames or pictures can give a distorted view of what really happened. But these incidents were also backed up by videos/tv which show exactly Jack's intention. I don't believe many of of us are basing our opinions solely on these individual photos - I posted them as reminders of the incidents as that is the topic of the thread. When you have a serial offender such as Jack has been throughout his whole career (including pre-sevco days) then there is only so often you can say it is a single frame that is being taken out of context.jack off tackle?
I never said once that tackle was allowed
I said isolated still photographs of any incident is not proof in itself
No idea where you get i am defending such tackles
itseasy to frame a picture to suit a particular agenda and without proper context its easy to cast blame. its exactly what sevco have done with anything they want, perpective is needed. A framed single photo is not enough.
As for gg
incedent i dont think it was a penalty i think gg played for penalty and it didnt get awarded
that said it is given quite often at other grounds for other teams.
The whatabout this then is a hun diversion tactic
Im telling you straight, refs are inherrently bent against Celtic
It needs sorted, selection process is clandestine and tigged imo
highlighting genuine mib bentness might help solve problem
highlighting not so clear cut incedents or contrived still (if they are not contextual photos) is not evidense, in fact it muddies the water. And it helps with conclusion of unproven and does not help fix the clandestine nature of referee selections or fairly leveling any inherrent bias
why no put up these videos with the stillI think we all understand that individual frames or pictures can give a distorted view of what really happened. But these incidents were also backed up by videos/tv which show exactly Jack's intention. I don't believe many of of us are basing our opinions solely on these individual photos - I posted them as reminders of the incidents as that is the topic of the thread. When you have a serial offender such as Jack has been throughout his whole career (including pre-sevco days) then there is only so often you can say it is a single frame that is being taken out of context.
I respect your opinion about the non-award of the GG penalty, but like most people on here and even in the media I cannot understand how you can come to your conclusion based on watching the incident. But we have discussed this enough and will agree to disagree on this. HH