No boardroom I know of has one a single trophy??and the next dudes may very well be
Better??….the Kelly’s/whites where here when nine in a row happened,,so this board haven’t really bettered them??not sure what board was in place when the big cup was won
this board walked into a vibrant well run celtic with a great stadium cash in the bank and sponsors throwing cash at them!!!.we’re is the improvement??they’re stagnant mate,,no vision just let’s protect what we have attitude….the money “the team” bring in should be spent on the team.the money the directors bring in should be spent running the club?my opinion.
the money club generates should be used to maximise value of club on the pitch and to do that they need to maximise value of club off the pitch.
that requires buying players who add value.
When price of a player costs more than value he contributes then you are not adding value.
in hyperinflated market only the clubs supplied with greater or equal increase in income in relation to inflation can add value by buying from hyperinflated market unless you scour the basement bin for undervalued or hidden gems.
You also need to hire managers who maximise value of your assets on pitch
thats their job
if they win league and maximise expected income then they helped win league.
if they hire dude who cannot maximise value of best players in the league then they failed.
And they are failing by backing a manager who is struggling to beat stooges with best players in country.
On that count they should be sacked. brought back a divisive manager who struggles to motivate players with his footballing ideas.
They brought him back. they should take fall with him if he fails.
You most certainly do need directors
the directors do help win or lose things
they are part of the same team
directors are there to ground club in reality of economy of club and add value if it can be done.
that invloves assessing value added of a player financially
throwing shareholders money doon a hole while adding to their (directors) personal wealth doesnt add value to club. the sevco way
When club became a plc they became a public company and that public company has access to more capital investments as result
but down side is that capital belongs to the shareholders who may not be interested in anything other than capital growth. When club earns income it belongs to shareholders.
shareholders hire blokes who will maximise their income.
if fans dont like that policy they need to buy out plc become a private company and run club however that private group of fans want it run.
At no point does the income ever belong to the fans.unless the fans collectively own club. but even then they will require a board to administer their club. the board must maximise playing squad if they want fans but must remain sustainable off pitch.
its simple
you want board sacked become a shareholder and petition the other shareholders to follow your better advice of investing their money.
