Hun Board saying this game in Australia is worth more to them than they make in the SPFL in a season.
As an aside, anyone else thinking there may be much more to all this pandering to them than meets the eye?
Take the 5 way agreement.....why in God’s name would our Board agree to this, especially in relation to what’s stated in relation to the Court of Session (CAS) written in to this agreement. It simply beggars belief to have agreed to this. It doesn’t make any sense.
So why? I’m now of the view there has to be much more to this.
Firstly, I firmly believe the Huns would not only threaten, (reference to them and Cinch) but see the league destruct if they are not helped in their mission to survive and succeed.
This issue still has to be resolved, and if the courts get involved in this, the implications may be dire for the SPFL, as per the potential infringement of UEFA rules and the consequences of breaching these rules to all the teams in the SPFL. Going forward, this action could also see Cinch pulling the plug on their sponsorship to the detriment of every team in the SPFL. Hun intimidation clearly atplay.
Secondly, so why are Celtic being seen to promote the so called Old Firm (reference to the Sydney tournament) which by extension financially props up the Huns and goes a long way to keep them financially viiable? With the Boards obvious pre existing knowledge of the resistance to this by the Support.
Thirdly, is it because we have been coerced in to it? Could it be, that it has been intimated to the Celtic Board, that if a helping hand wasn’t agreed to, support would be given to the court action in play against our Club, including the demand for severe sanctions, which could be significant (there is precedent in the US for this) should this action be successful, if we don’t play ball?
There’s ensuring the compliance to the continuity to the so called Old Firm business plan, and there’s complete capitulation to the demands of a self entitled entity which leaves them untouchable for ever and a day. Why would our Board choose the latter? It’s nonsensical.
For me, there has to be a rational reason our Board have totally capitulated and agreed to be completely dictated to on so many fronts.
Consequently, I’m coming to the belief there has to be something seriously threatening to us at play here. Is it possibly to do with what has been suggested above?...