........................What are these ''implications'' ? What are they concerned about ? Why would any country's administration body fear the ''implications'' of passing on a perfectly reasonable request to an independent arbitration body ?
And that is the $64,000 question Millsy!
So does that really mean Naw , cause now yer sayin it's fkn Naw , whit naw is it....................
‘Cause it’s just fckn NAW!
a was here firstHow many threads do we need on this ??? asking for ma pal Kelly...
aye we heard ye the first time
Was an answer given as to why it was not considered approriate to pursue the report, stakeholders are entitled to a reply.Celtic Shareholders Latest – Persistence Beaten by Resistance as SFA decide against taking ‘Res 12’ Complaint to CAS...
Celtic Shareholders Latest – Persistence Beaten by Resistance as SFA decide against taking 'Res 12' Complaint to CAS | The Celtic Star
PERSISTENCE BEATS RES12STANCE was the inspirational slogan created to support a group of Celtic shareholders who shone a light on the shady practices at the Scottish FA that allowed Rangers FC to gainthecelticstar.com
Was an answer given as to why it was not considered approriate to pursue the report, stakeholders are entitled to a reply.
..................................So does that really mean Naw , cause now yer sayin it's fkn Naw , whit naw is it
...................................They say because of the 'implications' of such a referral Boab.
In other words they're up to their necks in this and referring it to CAS would not just be turkey's voting for Christmas but turkey's stuffing themselves then jumping into the fucking oven.
Self preservation!
Mon the Auldheid as fan's, can we take this any further? or as customers is it the price we pay!As folk have been asking about what's the latest on Resolution 12.....here is the latest c&p from him on CQN below.....I hope he doesn't mind and I hope WC can get him on here some time soon to further share his thoughts with us all...
AULDHEID on 20TH MAY 2020 1:00 AM
Res12.
The moving spotlight.
What is emerging is that Rangers successors in effect got a pardon for the crimes of their predecessors so both the LNS sham and Res12 were never going to be investigated to see justice done.
What is nigh unforgivable is that Celtic, having accepted the 5 Way Agreement containing among other things the CAS referral clause that in effect has provided a pardon, not only refused to put the UEFA Licence issue before UEFA TWICE, but insisted their shareholders follow the SFA Judicial Process, which they then refused to question after 2 AGMs, knowing all along that the 5 Way Agreement would prevent justice being served.
The SFA have now in effect turned the spotlight back on Peter Lawwell personally whose record of deception in terms of saying something to give the impression of being on shareholders side in the pursuit of justice and a reformed SFA, in fact did nothing to follow up when hard evidence was provided.
The SFA have put Celtic and the governance of Scottish football direct in the spotlight by their statement without an explanation for closing the matter.
Closure will be obtained if an explanation that sets out whether the licence was processed within the rules in 2011 (and there is one about telling the truth) that there was no breach of two Articles one governing overdue payables, the other an Article requiring Rangers to notify the SFA of any change in circumstances since they granted the licence on 19th April 2011. A change which happened on 20th May six days before UEFA were notified of Scottish clubs to whom licence had been granted.
All else is avoidance.
Anything less is dereliction of duty by the SFA to carry out their responsibility to administer THEIR judicial protocol on which the credibility of Scottish football depends.
When supporters buy an ST for loyalty reasons what assurances can clubs give that the rules on which the game depends are being upheld without fear or favor when Petrie an architect of the 5 Way Agreement, can sit as Chairman on The SFA Board that have decided to stop investigating the basis of the decision by the Licensing Committee that Petrie chaired in 2011?
Celtic still are answerable to their shareholders at AGMs, which is where this will go next unless they make a statement either that no deception took place and support it or that it did, but in the long term interests of Scottish football they will not pursue the compensation that the evidence at https://www.res12.uk/ suggests they are entitled to seek.
It matters nought that any resolution gets voted down at an AGM, that is the place where CEOs and Directors are held accountable to shareholders and if it reveals beyond reasonable doubt that shareholders were lied to from 2013, then The Board may still remain in a job, they may be great business men (earning a few bob ) but their continuing presence will rob Celtic of any claim to be more than a club, the emotional tag that drew me back to Celtic after years of enjoying watch my kids play football.