Don't know much about this, but it doesn't seem ligit to me.
If Israel were planning to build a canal it seems to me the cost of diverting it around Gazza would be minimal.
Israel are bombing Gazza because Hamas killed hundreds of Israeli civilians.
Intellegence failures happen all the time and have done for centuries. Intellegence doesn't come as ONE clear piece of information. There are always different interpretaions and different opinions as to how to act.
If you look at the size and cost of the canal, do you really think Israel would have allowed the brutal masacre that took place, just to save the equivelant of "ten bob" by taking a short cut through Gazza?
No sure if israel ever spent a dime on anything that didnt make them more money. Now I have no idea how much it would cost to build canal route through an isreal that feels need for leibenroom by further expansions. But maybe just maybe it kills two birds with 1 stone. Destroys an urban area full of people they hate and then in turn rebuild flattened area into a canal route with the new area that needs rebuilt and claims the land as prize of war as reparation's. And doesnt infringe on any living space in israel which is so full they need to expand further.
Did Us slave traders who invaded Texas back in 1830s think twice about the 2 bob the increased value of the land with all the resources in the ground they got for free and compensation when they won the war with Mexico and struck oil silver and other extra valuable resources in meantime.
Maybe the water off coast of israel is useful for pipelines into europe supplying gas?
Maybe if the palestininans are living there the profits are harder to get rolling with legal disputes of who owns that water area around israel?
Flattened urban area that could used for Ireali canal worth billions without demolitioning any urban area in Israel proper. And just like texas rebellion way back the mighty US protection racket will boost land prices and nice healthy cash inflows to the peepo who like to shuffle non peepo onto shit land worth nought in comparison to what was stolen from them.
Now thats just conjecture in my mind. But the fact the press is not balanced in slightest and no mention ever in msm about the biggest canal project in region smells of manipulation to me. All isreali gas and resources were mostly stolen in military coup. The rightful owners have never been compensated and horded into ghetto type living under military embargo for over 50 years. What compensation do the palestinians get?
blown to smeetherines against known laws, starved and without proper shelter and mass destruction of the little the owned in their own homeland with no rights to their previously owned assets?
And im pretty sure i will be labeled antisemite for suggesting such a warped version of events. But arent the palestinians Semites? Arent the Arabs semites? Arent the irealis who are stunned at the destruction semites?
Yet Ben gurion canal costs peanuts?
maybe peanuts are more expensive than human lifes?