Celtic Statement hits back at Sky Sports and the perpetrators of racism

[Chubbstar 51]

Well fucking said Mr Duffy!

Hit the head on the nail Michael music to my ears excellent

 

[kelly]

The whole caboodle ,level5,sky,the stinkies,smsm,bbc they all for sure know who done it Slippery G let’s move on aye right don’t think so ,Ya ? Big Pete going to Ofcom brilliant
Wonder who is going to be the Scapegoat? Answer Spartacus, I am Spartacus,I am Spartacus, i am Spartacus so on and so on (etc) there all brothers together some body knows think they all know ,sorry (Kirk Douglas aka Spartacus )one of the all time greats in Hollywood when I was Boy

fk being spartacus runnin around in yer kecks

 

[Frenchie]

I think we're all of the opinion that Lawwel was in on it.

Surely not

 

[The Shamrock]

Surely not

Heaven's to Betsy, whatever next.

 

[Chubbstar 51]

Even trump wouldn't get away with this one.

Backfired big time Stevie G oh let’s move on time to forgive and forget Aye. Now Big Pete puts a spanner in the works says Sky should apologise to mr Morelos
As well ask yourself why did the Stinkies not ask for a apology ?plus if mr Morelos cannot speak or understand English how does he know what fans are shouting

 

[kelly]

Skys apology was weak but deliberate designed in away that no real blame sat at anyones door and in the hope eveyone will walk away happy

The only people being attacked were Celtic ,nobody else ,morelos was used and sevco fk knows why they got an apology i notice neither sevco or morelos or his agent have raised their voices or complained to sky or ofcom we all know why but strange just the same

Celtics hands are tied as to access to the team and the ground but they can go out there way to make it uncomfortable for these parasites ,the club should take the legal route once and for all

 

[Frenchie]

Skys apology was weak but deliberate designed in away that no real blame sat at anyones door and in the hope eveyone will walk away happy

The only people being attacked were Celtic ,nobody else ,morelos was used and sevco fk knows why they got an apology i notice neither sevco or morelos or his agent have raised their voices or complained to sky or ofcom we all know why but strange just the same

Celtics hands are tied as to access to the team and the ground but they can go out there way to make it uncomfortable for these parasites ,the club should take the legal route once and for all

Fergus would

 

[green sprig]

I think we're all of the opinion that Lawwel was in on it.

110% Shamrock,,he only crawled out of his hideout yesterday after he saw the daily ranger went to press at 15.36,, Celtic made the statement at 16.56,, does anybody believe that there would have been a statement from Parkhead if the daily ranger had not rocked the boat first..
This is the man who lied to his own shareholders,,how can he be trusted to defend Celtic Football Club..

HH.

 

[boab1916]

Every company would state thats bad for business.

res12 wasn’t acted upon as diligently and i am at a loss as to understand why.

any ideas.

Whether we like it or not and the issue may not be resolved fully due to an ongoing interest from interested parties and i fully back them in this, and also perhaps underlying issues which we are perhaps not to clued up on fully, as new evidence or suspicions arise or has been gathered, nevertheless the Celtic shareholders democratically voted down what you have claimed.

IMO the matter is still open, but in the opinion of the stakeholders who expressed their opinion through a vote it is over for them. In their eyes.

 

[Chubbstar 51]

fk being spartacus runnin around in yer kecks

Ah Kelly they were the days of wooden ships and iron men nowadays it’s iron ships and wooden men , one of the best films I ever seen Spartacus,brilliant Kirk who passed away today 103 years, by the way I still like a good Gladiator film Magic Ya !

 

[Richybhoy]

In the last few days we've seen a concerted attack against our club,our players and our fan's
the cutting of brakes with the intent to murder morelos and his family msm could'nt push that one hard enough.
Leigh Griffiths assault on the hamilton player, every media outlet,the ebt hundits they employ,all screaming for him to be cited and banned ( anybody see the stamp on Scott Brown last night,and phuq all in the media,is Scott Brown treated differently by the MIB's?).
Weve seen Celtic being cited by the Sfa on two counts, of, failing to control the players and a player complaining about a controversial award of a penalty, is some phuqer at the sfa designated to watching Celtic matches in the hope they can find something, anything they can use against Celtic,
Then Sky sports racist abuse clusterphuq,the world's biggest sports coverage provider,could'nt check to see if a translation was accurate,knowing full well the outrage it would cause, with the CEO's reaction hopefully now the penny has dropped,we're not taking this shite anymore and will now take on all comers,because everyone wants us to falter, the thought of 9 in a row terrifies them,the possibility of 10 will be our biggest GIRFUY to Scotland's fixed game ever! COYBIG ☘

Get right fuckin in tae them Michael,,on ye go HH

 

[Frenchie]

Whether we like it or not and the issue may not be resolved fully due to an ongoing interest from interested parties and i fully back them in this, and also perhaps underlying issues which we are perhaps not to clued up on fully, as new evidence or suspicions arise or has been gathered, nevertheless the Celtic shareholders democratically voted down what you have claimed.

IMO the matter is still open, but in the opinion of the stakeholders who expressed their opinion through a vote it is over for them. In their eyes.

All very confusing sorry.

so do you agree with res12 or with the stakeholders?

and if its the latter may i ask why as historically stakeholders n prev money men and boards have shafted the club and its fans.

fergus was a beacon of hope that things could be better and i think he did bring a lot more fairness and transparency to the Club.

i am not the biggest fan of peter lawwell by a long chalk.

 

[boab1916]

All very confusing sorry.

so do you agree with res12 or with the stakeholders?

and if its the latter may i ask why as historically stakeholders n prev money men and boards have shafted the club and its fans.

fergus was a beacon of hope that things could be better and i think he did bring a lot more fairness and transparency to the Club.

i am not the biggest fan of peter lawwell by a long chalk.

My concern is when did the Celtic board become aware of the Res 12 issue. I neither agree with any of them, but thats just an opinion I have from what i have been reading and thats why it would be interesting and make sense if the board would inform the fans of what the situation is. Nevertheless, we never seen Sevco making it to the high court but strangers things can happen and sometimes the wheels of justice grind more slowly than some would wish for.

 

[The Shamrock]

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1224419268575612930/pu/vid/1280x720/uqYRYpakIu9OwMGv.mp4?tag=10

Off topic nbut worth a wee look.

Naw it isnae.

 

[Frenchie]

My concern is when did the Celtic board become aware of the Res 12 issue. I neither agree with any of them, but thats just an opinion I have from what i have been reading and thats why it would be interesting and make sense if the board would inform the fans of what the situation is. Nevertheless, we never seen Sevco making it to the high court but strangers things can happen and sometimes the wheels of justice grind more slowly than some would wish for.

I think they grind along just fine unless a quicker result suits the brethren.

i don’t trust the board one bit. That 5 way agreement is testament to that and the way they negated no further action on res12 as not in the interests of Celtic..... really? Not in the interests of our club.

 

[boab1916]

I think they grind along just fine unless a quicker result suits the brethren.

i don’t trust the board one bit. That 5 way agreement is testament to that and the way they negated no further action on res12 as not in the interests of Celtic..... really? Not in the interests of our club.

Have you seen the 5 WA and the names on it, thats a bit of a claim to make if you are claiming the board negotitated a path for Sevco whilst other clubs sat idly by and known fully, they the other clubs some small, may be in danger of liquidation themselves with no return to the game.

 

[Frenchie]

Have you seen the 5 WA and the names on it, thats a bit of a claim to make if you are claiming the board negotitated a path for Sevco whilst other clubs sat idly by and known fully, they the other clubs some small, may be in danger of liquidation themselves with no return to the game.

Do u believe in God?

does the absence of seeing Him mean you don’t believe he’s there?

the 5 way agreement i have not seen but have read reports suggesting that peter never raised a finger in contention with it, don’t you find that strange.

for the avoidance of doubt, i do find that strange. especially given his additional role at the sfa and the clout our club has.

doncaster and peter very friendly and doncaster is on that document.

Don’t have to see to believe. Shady shenanigans all over that

 

[boab1916]

Do u believe in God?

Not really relevant to the question or the issue at hand

does the absence of seeing Him mean you don’t believe he’s there?

I dont see air but i trust thats what keeps me alive

the 5 way agreement i have not seen but have read reports suggesting that peter never raised a finger in contention with it, don’t you find that strange.

Who made the reports claim and can you confirm the sources reliability

for the avoidance of doubt, i do find that strange. especially given his additional role at the sfa and the clout our club has.

Was he not a member of the SPFL with Doncaster, and if so two different organisations, so does not put him in the frame when the deal was done

doncaster and peter very friendly and doncaster is on that document.

Doncaster would be the chief of the SPFL, but that does not ean he has to share his workload with Celtic

Don’t have to see to believe. Shady shenanigans all over that

Yep but I am sure you will not want to be the one who flicks the switch only to discover later a reprieve had been granted witout your notification

 

[kelly]

sfa whitewash
sevco coach got a 5 game ban will serve 3 with 2 suspended (ffs) this is for the 29th game ,no other person censured

 

[Commo Estas 64]

Do u believe in God?

Not really relevant to the question or the issue at hand

Every question can be relevant or dismissed, SFA ideal

does the absence of seeing Him mean you don’t believe he’s there?

I dont see air but i trust thats what keeps me alive

you've never entered a 'confined space' it seems ?

the 5 way agreement i have not seen but have read reports suggesting that peter never raised a finger in contention with it, don’t you find that strange.

Who made the reports claim and can you confirm the sources reliability

DOB, occupation, ? sounds familiar

for the avoidance of doubt, i do find that strange. especially given his additional role at the sfa and the clout our club has.

Was he not a member of the SPFL with Doncaster, and if so two different organisations, so does not put him in the frame when the deal was done

Roles are defined in contracts, few see others contracts, so hard to define his actual role there.

doncaster and peter very friendly and doncaster is on that document.

Doncaster would be the chief of the SPFL, but that does not ean he has to share his workload with Celtic

Don’t have to see to believe. Shady shenanigans all over that

Yep but I am sure you will not want to be the one who flicks the switch only to discover later a reprieve had been granted witout your notification

very trumpist, lol