Maybe I didn't quite state my disinterest in the finances clearly enough. By frugal I meant we have budgeted sufficiently well for a long time, verging (outside the MON years) towards the lower side of risk (as a layman you understand so please forgive any framing issues
until Rodgers wage increases. Frugality was not the point of my post.
This I have no interest in, I'll be honest. Other than to say this is how I'd describe how I feel about our approach to running a club.
I'm happy how we budget. delighted, no problems, none.
My only concern is if we continue on this route but lose the eye for a player and we start to lose track ( see current unbalanced squad with non performing/playing support outside of first 11). My argument is that Celtic have consistently behaved the same way. Probably spending one year out of 5 on a substantial basis. If this continues that for 4 out of 5 we don't, then in those years we do I want a Head of recruitment to find a wanyama, Van Dijk, Dembele, Hooper, Ntcham etc. to support the playing side.
I believe the value in our system is in very little way monetary, it's in staff, the right staff to support the manager to recognise the players we can target in our historical approach.
My argument wasn't over the frugality,that is simply a word I chose to say how I believe we are run now and previously and questioning the e-tims argument there is no sea change like they state in the original posters link, and have been run for some time.
Insert any word you choose for your own particular take on finances, my point was clear from the final paragraph. My issue is on who finds the talent within whatever budget is laid out and how I'm more concerned that the role is filled by someone suitable, that.'s the key for me. The where's and why nots of frugality I'll leave for the number crunchers. They've done a fine job so far bar MON later years.