DHoopster
Well-known member
McGinn story is pure hearsay
You keep accusing me of saying things I haven't said
I dont want a detailed business plan
Im telling you that from our accounts we are massive risk takers and have been good at it to point our ceos has more than paid his wages in his running of club.
But im all for sacking him for silence and hubris and letting torpor set in.
Everything is is conjecture and hearsay
bottom line is does he justify his wage by value added
the accounts say he does.
Its you who claim there is a middle ground
I dont see it. if you see it then surely that would be nice to share the better plan.
Feck McGinn he wanted money he wanted first team
rodgers the greatest manager in world ever decided he was bit part player
he was risk at price offered he was probably not gonna get much gametime
and who knows he might well have flopped under the pressures
I wanted him
he chose AV
the bullshit msm gash and the hearsay stirrers working on behalf of the no plan is better gang, anarchy in the uk, chearge mob among our supposed in the know support is sickening.
huns detest lawell
they make up all sorts of shite and eventually our clickbait pundits throw it out to the wolves to pick over
I would also like to see the wages of lawell coz it could well also be hearsay and misinformation twisted to stick the knife right in there.
but let me assure you I won't lose sleep if he gets sacked
its that simple but the gash he aint been worth his weight doesnt fit the accounts he produces year on out
you want to take the most extreme negative slants possible thats your call
ill leave you with what has lawell ever done for celtic
quite a lot actually
but feck it he fecked the 10 and he is a silent sneering hubris overpaid cunt
still no sure you get better value though even if he was best paid ceo in football
his risk taking is strong but its very good in his tenure and he gets slated for getting some of the best deals ever seen
but it wasn't him
he fluked it
The following points are not from several of your posts, but from the single one quoted.
And rather amazingly in order, so you contradict your own self in the flow.
followed a bit later byIm telling you that from our accounts we are massive risk takers and have been good at it to point our ceos has more than paid his wages in his running of club.
later still bybottom line is does he justify his wage by value added
the accounts say he does.
I would also like to see the wages of lawell coz it could well also be hearsay and misinformation twisted to stick the knife right in there.
Quotes which would not take any accountant to work out that you not only contradict yourself, but make selective claims that would more than suggest that you have not actually read Celtic's reports or accounts, as you would not be stating the last point. (which contradicts your first quoted claim btw)